About Me

Name: ApolloSpeaks
Email: reninvest2007@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

THE SECRET TO ACHIEVING 0% UNEMPLOYMENT THE OBAMA WAY

          
 HOW CAN WE GET UNEMPLOYMENT DOWN TO


     
        USING OBAMA'S METHODOLOGY?                          
 
When I heard today's unemployment stats from the Labor Department for January, that the jobless rate had dropped by 3/10ths of a % down to 9.7 while the private sector lost 20,000 jobs (adding no one to the workforce), it dawned on me how Obama overnight could virtually abolish unemployment reaching the historic low of 0% without giving work to every jobless person in a massive public works program. Now since all of us rightwingers want Obama to fail, not because he's a lefty but because he's a blacky, you mustn't share this secret with him lest he use it to save his hide and win a second term. For the secret of collapsing the unemployment rate to zero, the secret of survival staring Obama in the face, is to discourage every jobless person looking for work to stop their search. Those who cease looking may be without jobs with starving wives and kids to feed; but they're not among the truly unemployed by Obama's methodology.

On the other hand, if you want to drive Obama from presidential power and guarantee a Republican sweep come November the way forward is clear: do the reverse of the above and get the jobless millions who are sitting on their useless butts to go job hunting again. The unemployment rate would soar into the depression sphere of 14% or more, and Obama and the Dems would be toast.

In sum, we reach zero level unemployment by stopping the jobless from looking for work; while depression level unemployment requires the reverse. Welcome to the Orwellian world of Obama unemployment.





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

EVIDENCE OF PROVIDENTIAL DESIGN IN THE HISTORIC ELECTION OF SCOTT BROWN (WITH A POSTSCRIPT ON BROWN AND JFK)


 
Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama's mentor, friend and kingmaker, died 217 days into Obama's presidency and 21 days after Obama's 48th birthday. Moreover, the historic, earthshaking January 19th election of Scott Brown was 147 days after his death*.

217 is a multiple of 7 31x
21 is a multiple of 7 3x
147 is a multiple of 7 21x

*January 20, 2009 (Obama’s Inaugural) to August 25, 2009 (Ted Kennedy’s Death)=217 days; and August 25, 2009 to January 19, 2010=147 days.

From January 3, 1953 when John Kennedy began his 7 year career in the US Senate until Ted Kennedy's death on August 25th of last year the so called “Kennedy Seat” was 7 months into its 56th year for a total of 679 months*; 679 is a multiple of 7 97x.

*56x12=672+7=679

As Ted Kennedy's Providential death by a meaningful, significant prophetic LEFT sided brain tumor made Scott Brown's candidacy and victory possible Kennedy at the time was 154 days into his 77th year. 154 is a multiple of 77 2x and 7 22x. Amazingly, and I believe providentially, reinforcing my view of Intelligent Design in Kennedy‘s death and Brown‘s election, the numbers 154 and 77, and the digits 1-5-4 in a different combination, connects Brown's election with Conservative Republican Robert Novak's parallel LEFT-sided brain seizure in 2008* and death in August 7 days before Kennedy's, hence:

7-27-2008** (Novak's brain seizure at Cape Cod) to 1-19-2009 (Brown's election)=1 year, 5 months and 23 days or 541***days. 541 divided by 7 gives us 77 weeks.

*Novak's and Kennedy's parallel LEFT-sided tumor attacks, exhaustively treated by me here , are prophetic indications of the coming collapse of the liberal Democrat left (and perhaps the moderate liberal wing of the GOP), which is now advancing rapidly, signaled unmistakably by Scott Brown's victory over Ted Kennedy's Senate seat.

** Novak suffered his brain seizure on the 27th day of July the 7th month of the year. On January 19, 2010 Scott Brown was elected the 27th Class 1 Senator in Massachusetts history (see below).

*** The same numbers 1-5-4 in a different sequence.

Indeed, 8-18-2009 (Novak's death) to 1-19-2010 (Brown's election)=154 days. That the exact same number of days (154) separating Ted Kennedy's 77th birthday from the day of his death is equal to the number of days (154) separating Robert Novak’s death* from Scott Brown’s election victory is truly mind boggling and could only be the work of a Higher Power orchestrating these events as a prophetic sign prefiguring the historic social and political shift occurring in America toward the Conservative Right.

*On a minor but no less relevant note it just so happened that Novak died 14 days after Obama's 48th birthday, 14=7+7, hence: August 4, 2009 (Obama's 48th birthday) to August 18, 2009 (Novak's death)=14 days.

And lastly, Scott Brown's election on January 19th was the 364th day of the Obama presidency. 364 in a multiple of 7 52x*.

*It is interesting to note that Scott defeated Coakley by 52% of the vote. 52 is a varient of the number 7, 5+2=7; and is the reverse of the number 25 corresponding to the day in August when Ted Kennedy died.

JFK, TEDDY AND THE 27TH CLASS 1 SENATOR

John Kennedy held his Senate seat for 7 years, 11 months and 19 days*. Ted Kennedy won his brother's old seat in an election held on the 7th day of the 11th month in the year 1962 or 11-7-1962.
 
*January 3, 1953 (JFK begins Senate career) to December 22, 1960 (JFK resigns office)=7 years, 11 months and 19 days.

On January 19, 2010 Scott Brown became the 41st Republican Senator elect of the 111th Congress*. He also became the 27th Class 1 Senator elect in Massachusetts’ history (
see). Amazingly, 41x27=1107 or 11-07 giving us the date of Ted Kennedy's election to the Senate in 1962.

*The Democrat controlled 111th Congress was in its 378th day when Brown was elected to the US Senate. 378 is a multiple of 7 54x..


As Ted Kennedy’s death in 2009 made Scott Brown's election possible as the 41st Republican Senator in Congress it is interesting to note that when the number 41 is multiplied by 7x7, or 49, it equals 2009.

From the start of John Kennedy's Senate career on January 3, 1953 to Scott Brown's victory on January 19th is 57 years and 16 days (the 7th number of the 50s series). As this Senate seat has been called ”The Kennedy Seat” when we translate the letters of this complete three word name into their numeric values we get the following remarkable result:

THE KENNEDY SEAT*
285 2555547  1512=57 the exact number of years the Democrats held this seat (see Note 1).

*The three words “The Kennedy Seat” have 14 letters (7+7) and the name Kennedy has 7 letters. Moreover, as The Kennedy Seat was vacant from August 25, 2009 to September 24 for a total of 30 days this would bring the total number of years the seat was physically occupied by Democrats to under 57 years. But the 57 years is restored when we calculate the length of time from the start of JFK’s Senate career up to  today February 4th when Brown was certified and sworn in; for this gives us an exact total of 57 years and 1 day.

Martha Coakley who received backing from the Kennedys to retain Democrat control of “The Kennedy Seat" was born on the 14th day (7+7) of the 7th month of 1953, the year John Kennedy started his Senate career. This was exactly 192 days* or 27 weeks after Kennedy was sworn in. 27 is the number of the Class 1 Senate seat Coakley ran for in vain (see Postscript III below).

*January 3, 1953 (start of JFK's Senate career) to July 14, 1953=192 days or 27 weeks.

Astonishingly, when Ted Kennedy died on 8-25-2009 it was the 207th day of the year, the number 27 without the intervening zero.

THE MEANING OF THE NUMBER 7

Is it merely coincidental that the number 7 appears in different forms as a constant and powerful factor throughout this study? Not if you understand that 7 is the number of completion.This is the meaning of the number assigned to it by ancient traditions the world over. For 7 days complete a week as does the 7th note a music scale and our senior years, the 7th age of man, completes and crowns our earthly life as Shakespeare said*. 7 signifies completed cycles, eras and ages and the historic election of Scott Brown not only completed and ended an era in Democrat politics in Massachusetts, but as Ted Kennedy who held that seat for 46 years** was born in the year 1932, the year when FDR defeated Herbert Hoover and New Deal Liberalism was born, Scott’s victory foreshadows the coming end of the house that FDR built as the Federal government spends itself into oblivion under a Ted Kennedy made President who is FDR on crack cocaine. More than Scott Brown’s historic election in Democrat Blue State Massachusetts Barack Obama is the sign that New Deal/Great Society Big Government Liberalism is in its End Time*** and that radical, painful but necessary changes are coming to America in the years ahead to make us solvent and economically powerful again.
 

*As You Like It, 2.7 139-167.

**Ironically, as Ted Kennedy’s Senate career lasted 46 years till his death, this was the age at which JFK was assassinated.

***This will be made evident from my upcoming blogbook: The Rise and Fall of Barack Obama.

 
Postscript I: The Election of FDR and Barack Obama

Exactly 76 years separates the election of Barack Obama in 2008 from FDR's in 1932. It is fascinating to note that 76 is a factor of the number 19 4x the day of the year that Scott Brown was elected US Senator. Moreover, when we multiply 76 by 12 it gives us the number 912 indicating the date 9-12 or September 12, the month and day Scott Brown was born in 1959*. Furthermore, when multiplied by 15 76 gives us the number 1140, a multiple of 114 10x or the date 11-4 when Obama was elected president. And most inauspiciously for Obama and Democrats 76 is a factor in the number 1976 26x the year Jimmy Carter was elected President, the significance of which doesn’t need further comment.

Postscript II: Scott Brown and JFK

John F. Kennedy was a center-right President on economic, defense and national security issues, being a patriotic nationalist, hawkish anti-Communist and supply side tax cutter, who wouldn‘t feel at home in today’s Democrat Party. As Scott Brown’s pro-defense, tough on terror, tax cutting campaign was closer in substance and spirit to JFK’s world view than either Martha Coakley’s Kennedy backed candidacy or Barack Obama’s ideology (the so-called “new JFK”) it is fascinating that Brown ran a campaign ad featuring himself and JFK calling for across the board tax cuts for growing the economy and creating jobs (see). This is fascinating in light of today’s surprise push by Brown to assume his Senate seat today a week (7 days) ahead of schedule*. For the spirit of John Kennedy is reborn in Scott Brown; and as a providential sign that this is so, that the man who now own’s the “Kennedy Seat” is JFK reborn, today February 4th** is the 35th day of the year, the presidency number of John F. Kennedy.

*Brown's swearing in was originally scheduled for February 11.
 
**As Massachusetts was the Tea Party state and cradle of the American Revolution February 4th was the 221st anniversary of George Washington's election as President of the United States. The destructive leadership of Obama and the Dems is forcing America to return to its roots of liberty.
 
Postscript III: Martha Coakley's Defeat and the Fate of Obama's Egalitarian Schemes (excerpted from Barack Obama and the "Curse" of the Kennedys ).

Was it accidental irony or Providence in motion that a Massachusetts Senate seat held by Democrats for over half a century beginning with John Kennedy in 1953 was lost to a Kennedy backed candidate born that very year? For Martha Coakley came into this world on July 14, 1953 exactly 192 days into JFK's Senate career*.

Is it accidental irony or a Providential sign of coming success for Republicans in 2010 and 12 that the number 192 when multiplied by ten gives us the year 1920? For 1920 was a banner year for the GOP when they added the 29th Presidency to their control of Capital Hill, in what was to be an Era of Normalcy following the radical Wilson years.

And lastly, was it accident or Providence that July 14, 1953 the day Martha Coakley was born fell on the 164th anniversary of the French Revolution, the first egalitarian revolution in history of which Obama and Democrats are heir**? Could this be the last of many ominous signs denoting the fate of Obama's statist plans and egalitarian dream to Europeanize and Frenchify our capitalist country and make everything politically correct and green? Of this I have no doubt.
 
*January 3, 1953 (the start of JFK's Senate career) to July 14, 1953 (Martha Coakly's birth)=192 days.

** The French Revolution started July 14, 1789.

NOTES

1.Below is the numerological table used in this work:
 
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ARIANNA HUFFINGTON VS GLENN BECK


 

Arianna dear, you have much more to fear from our poor misguided fool of a president than you do from Glenn Beck however somewhat fearful he is that Obama is leading a leftwing conspiracy to intentionally destroy the economy. If Richard Hofstadter, whose essay you cited on ABC on paranoia in politics, were alive today he would have approached Glenn Beck a different way, like more intellectually: showing that Obama for all his ignorance and flaws at worst was crashing the economy unknowingly and that Beck is simply wrong; or at best the reverse was true: that the economy was recovering which would put Beck and his predictions in a stew.

If you believe in Obama and his stimulus plans-which never worked for anyone from Hoover to the Japanese-then why not challenge Beck's "wrong" view that he's taking us to the economic slaughter house, and that the middle class is coming back. Wouldn't that make better sense? It's better than making an arse of yourself trying to prove what isn't true: that Beck is a hell raising demagogue intentionally inciting hatred and racial violence against the President-as if he were a rightwing Father Coughlin. That's paranoia, too.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PREDICTION OF LEFTIST VIOLENCE IN POST-OBAMA AMERICA




The collapse of the Obama presidency and his socialist agenda is the last hurrah for Sol Alinskyism and the dream of a bloodless revolution in America. In the post-Obama era I foresee angry, traumatized radicals on the Left returning to the violence and terrrorism of the 60s-possibly joining with Moslem jihadists in an alliance of murder and evil. For the catastrophe of Obama will prove to them that Alinsky's non-violent path through the system-using democracy to destroy freedom-leads only to defeat; and that the Socialist Revolution can only come at the barrel of a gun. We haven't seen the last of Bill Ayers and the Weathermen. Once again we will hear them cry:

 
and
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BARACK THE BOLD OBAMA

 

The new bold Obama at the Republican retreat in Baltimore. Was this the start of his own Bold and Fresh Tour? The O now stands for Oberman, German for Overman or Superman..
 
It was the Roman poet Virgil (following Terence) who said: Fortune favors the bold, and Obama, the new Obama, agrees. Obama appearing at the Republican retreat at Baltimore opens a new chapter in the saga of Barack Hussein Obama. It definitely was a brilliant move and PR coup with Huffington Post likening the event to Daniel entering the lion's den with Obama mauling the Republican lions and elephants (see ). And all the folks at Morning Joe agree that Obama's timid girlie man days are behind him and that he bested the GOP*. Gone unreported by the press was that Obama was factually wrong and intellectually dishonest throughout the event (political correctness and factual incorrectness go hand in hand). But Obama's boldness was the thing. And today's news that the US in defiance of Beijing is moving ahead with arms sales to Taiwan, to punish the Chicoms for lack of cooperation on Iran**, reinforces the emerging image, the rising phoenix from the ashes of January 19, of a tough new bold Obama fighting to save his collapsing dream of big government triumphant over everything. In truth, Barack Hussein is no prophet Daniel. He's got as much foresight as David Paterson has eyesight. In reality Hussein Obama is a Darius or Nebuchadnezzar wanna be*** like Saddam Hussein whose intransigence made Obama what he is today: President wanting to be a venerated King.

Let Obama be as bold as he wants
Fortune will favor him not.
For his vision of America and its Manifest Destiny
Are worlds and worlds apart.

*Did you see the jubilation on MSN and the play be play analysis by Matthews and Maddow? It was another celebration of the historic, inimitable, unprecedented Obama; the Messiah reborn fully armed for the fight.

**Now the poor beseiged Red Chinese will have to deploy fifty more nuclear missiles aimed at Taiwan to deter a mainland invasion.


***Darius the ancient King of Persia sent Daniel to the Lions den for defying his edicts. Earlier in his prophetic career Daniel served King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, the conqueror of Israel. Saddam Hussein believed that he was Nebuchadnezzar's reincarnation destined like the ancient king to vanquish Israel, level Jerusalem and send the Jews into exile.

It's important to note that Fascist Iran sees itself as the new Darius destined to conquer Iraq (Babylonia in ancient times) which it's stealthily doing as I write (
see.). If the US wants to save Iraq from Iranian imperial domination (turning Iraq into a new Vietnam and strategic setback for the US) we must blockcade Iranian ports (see) and supporting anti-regime forces in Iran work like hell for the nuclear mullahs' downfall.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

EMPEROR OBAMA HAS NO CLOTHS OR PLAN FOR SOCIALIST VICTORY


Obama may be more red than black, but a Vladimir Lenin he is not.

I respectfully disagree with those who believe that there's an intentional leftwing conspiracy underway headed by Barack Obama to collapse the economy* for political gain and more power grabs. That would be suicidal and makes no political sense. Obama is a shallow, clueless, weak, boyish, incoherent radical fool and not an evil hardened Lenin-like genius with a diabolical master plan to seize absolute power and realize his dream of a United Socialist States of America (called by him "a more perfect Union"). Those who believe this give Obama too much credit as he is a mediocre man with delusions of grandeur ideologically stuck on the stupid idea that egalitarian justice is the solution to everything from the economy to strategic policy. True, Obama wants to "fundamentally and foundationally” transform America into a European style socialist nanny state for a start; but he has no way or roadmap for getting there within our brilliantly devised conservative system of divided government-a system that Obama hates even more than the Conservatives who defend it. Such a transformation-Obama’s hopeless mission and imagined fate-is not America’s destiny as the Tea Party movement and recent elections unmistakably show. In fact, Obama’s lashing out at the Supreme Court and Congress in his State of the Union was an expression of his scorn for and disgust with our divided, difficult, checks and balances system of government which hampering and blocking his radical agenda he cannot overcome without massive public support. This was Sol Alinsky’s dream of a super iron willed charismatic leader winning the White House and coming to power in times of chaos and mayhem; and, promising order and radical change, leading the masses in victorious revolt and making the revolutionary future of total state control a reality. But this plan has boomeranged or “Obamaranged” as our first Alinskyite President instead has caused a populist backlash against his leadership and confused, destructive big government schemes (
see).
 
*Diminish our economy yes, collapse it no; such a thing could only push the country farther to the Right. Is Obama that much of a blind man that he can't see this?
 
As Obama’s dream of transforming and collectivizing America turns to dust; as the realization slowly dawns that he’s not the “chosen one” for anything other than the discrediting of his progressive creed and the revival of traditional values, constitutional norms and the Reagan Right, a desperate Obama fighting against the quick collapse of his presidency (predicted by me here ) will is taking the path of Woodrow Wilson campaigning to exhaustion to conquer public opinion just as Wilson vainly attempted when he fought heroically* for the League (see ). Get ready for the spectacle that will wow the Left but end in utter defeat-the unwinnable battle to save Obama's presidency and socialist dreams that started in Baltimore at the GOP retreat.
 
*Wilson was willing to risk his health and presidency to persuade America to join the League of Nations.

Postscript: Totalitarianism and Transnationalism

The two key elements in Obama’s vision for America and its place in the world are totalitarianism and transnationalism. By totalitarianism I mean the creeping ascendancy of government control over the totality of our lives; and by transnationalism I mean the ebbing away of America’s independenace and sovereignty by subjecting it to the authority of international bodies like the UN and the International Court of Justice. Those who deny the truth of this, that this is Obama’s radical vision for our country, are either liars or fools. But for those unsure with open minds who want to learn the truth I advise three things: listen to Glen Beck*, read David Horowitz’s Barack Obama’s Rules for Radicals (see) and consider this :

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
219132 8311595 62141 =64

TOTALITARIANISM
262139219915914 =64

TRANSNATIONALISM
2915151296513914 =64 (see Notes)

Trickery, wizardry, sorcery as Fabius Cunctator says (see)? Or is this Providence using numeric signs to reveal the hidden truth about Obama's unquenchable thirst for national power and un-American transnational schemes?

*The very vigilant, wise and great Glenn Beck is a little too paranoid and emotionally extreme in believing that Obama has some brilliantly conceived plan to turn America into a totalitarian state. Obama can increase his czars a thousand fold but without the people he is lost; and from here on in he’ll boldly try to win their hearts and souls as he doubles down and goes into the Wilsonian evangelical mode.
 
NOTES
 
Below is the numerological table used in this work
 
 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA DOES BALTIMORE, OR I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT IDEOLOGY (SLIGHTLY REVISED)

 

 
Why would the genius of the ages, a man who knows it all having all the answers to our woes, condescend from the heights and meet with Republicans to learn from them? What could they possibly teach him? Why did he go? To show he wasn’t scared of the big bad GOP? To shame them with his smiles, lies, hypocrisy and phony hypnotizing charms*? Is that why he came?

The first lie of the day was that his failing stimulus plan was finally working based on inconclusive data needing revision that the economy grew by 5.7% last quarter. The preliminary evidence shows that consumer spending was down from the quarter before-last quarter covered Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years-and more than half of the “growth” was from businesses ordering product to restock their shelves. This is not a sign you can hang your hat on. But not for our White House Tinker Bell. For him it foretells a robust economic turnaround, a vindication of his plan, despite negative news from the CBO of long term double digit unemployment and weak GDP growth (see).

The second Obama lie was that his stimulus plan was all job creating substance and no money wasting pork; a whopper if there was one that needs no further thought.

The third lie, and I’ll stop right here lest I bore you to tears, was his claim: “I AM NOT AN IDEOLOGUE.” The man who believes that America is fundamentally and foundationally flawed needing transformation from head to toe is not an ideologue? Give me a break! This is up there with Bill Clinton’s “I did not have sex with that woman.” This mother of all lies gives us insight into Obama’s real reason for attending the meeting: It was a PR stunt to put Republicans on the defensive by making them look like the real, rigid, unbending ideologues; and himself as the moderate, reasonable, compromising pragmatist seeking common ground. It’s called pivoting to the center without moving an inch. Fooling the public with new smoke and mirror tricks. May be, he hopes, if he repeats it enough something will stick. In coming Townhall meetings, speeches and road trips we will hear this incredible shrinking man bitterly complain that ’I met with the GOP and they refused to triangulate with me so stuck are they on ideology. Because of them nothing can get done. They have practically shutdown Washington.’

*When I say “phony hypnotizing charms” I mean a magnetism artificially induced and caused by a psychic trick Obama learned from Rev. Wright (he has it too) which I wrote about in Obama Mahara Ji: The Secret of Obama’s Hypnotic Powers (see). Fascination with Obama’s superficial mesmeric powers (called by some Obamanosis) is wearing thin as it soon did with other false, entrancing messiahs of history.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PRE-9/11 MAN IN POST 9/11 WORLD: OBAMA'S WEAK ON STATELESS TERRORISTS SPEECH



In Obama's pre-9/11 brain these structures are still standing, or resurrected from the grave.

The presidency of Barack Obama is on a rendezvous with destiny; a terrible destiny; a destiny that's an economic, national security and foreign policy catastrophe; and predictably in last night's speech Obama refused to save himself and change his disastrous course-which didn't surprise me at all as I believe that I've divined from a multitude of signs, starting with his anointing as the "new JFK," Obama's certain tragic fate (see).

Indeed, adding to the many signs of coming woe to Obama and the nation was last night's angry, arrogant, condescending, speech; the speech of an empty, petty, senseless man, the poorest of God's creatures ever to be president, with a grandiose self-image of a larger than life hero destined for historical greatness*.

*After the speech Chris Matthews' famous tingle up his leg was replaced by something greater: "an epiphany of national leadership." So bad is Matthews need for a great effective charismatic leftist leader that he desperately wants to believe Obama's childish self-delusions and messianic fantasies.


Little change in substance unchanged in agenda the message of the speech was painfully clear: government is the plan for fixing everything; it's the answer whether we like it or not; believe it or not, whether it's ever succeeded or not; and if by the end of his term Obama crashes and burns and enters the president's hall of shame it won't be his fault-everyone else will be blamed-as he had the right views and his intentions were good-which would make him a candidate for liberal sainthood.

From healthcare to the economy, from education to energy more government control and intervention is coming to save us. Obama will pursue his agenda to the bitter end regardless of its impact on America, his presidency, his party and the world. Now who out there will dispute with me that Obama's middle name is a sign of his intransigency and self-destructive fate (see)?


ON NATIONAL SECURITY

Obama is dangerously weak on national security having made a series of disastrous decisions that's put our security in perilous jeopardy. And not only was this weakness mirrored in his speech, in the little time he spent on Islamic terror*, but in the emblematic timing of its delivery. For just as critics like D*ck Cheney rightly say that Obama has regressed into a pre-9/11 mentality-the 9/10 days of treating terrorists as defendants and not enemy combatants-amazingly, and perhaps meaningfully as an omen of things to come, Obama took the stage last night giving the customary thank yous at 9:10 and started his speech just seconds into 9:11. A fitting way to start a speech that ignored the brave heroes of Ft. Hood who risked life and limb bringing down the murdering lethal Nidal Hasan.


*Of the speeches 7120 words only 502 were devoted to national security and the War on Terror. That's a tad over 7% of the speech.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BILL O’REILLY: BOLD, FRESH AND INCORRECT

 

Last night on the Factor (see) a deluded Bill O'Reilly congratulated himself for out predicting most of the "Obama haters" and "cool aid drinkers" on the Right by "correctly" foreseeing Obama's move to the center with a proposal to freeze spending. Indeed, O'Reilly used this apparent concession to the Right as proof that he is wiser, more prescient and balanced in his views than Rush, D*ck Morris, Hannity and Beck, and the rest of the anti-Obama Right most of whom believe that he's a hopeless big government socialist ideologue; a leopard who can't change his spots determined to stay his disastrous course to the bitter end (see).

O'Reilly then played a clip from his Talking Points of January 20 where he made his prediction: "If "Obama wants to make a comeback [after Massachusetts] then he must simplify healthcare and cut spending and taxes to stimulate the economy and create jobs." Wanting to make a comeback Obama now sees the light and taking O'Reilly's advice he is moving rightward by proposing a spending freeze. Bully for Bill; what a coup for the hated superstar of Fox News who the White House sees as an enemy; or could it be that his prediction was pure bull? What he predicted was "spending cuts" not a spending freeze; the two are not the same thing which means that O'Reilly predicted nada, zilch, nothing.

Indeed, assuming the best that Obama is serious about his proposal and that it's not mere gimmickry to fool the folks nonetheless where is his movement to the Right claimed by O'Reilly? How is a freeze a movement anywhere? When O'Reilly's standing still where is he moving? A freeze means the absent of movement in any direction left, right, up, down, forwards, backwards, sideways. A freeze on spending means putting a stop to the rise in expenditures not ending the insanity of massive unsustainable deficits. Conservatives want substantial and meaningful cuts in federal spending to roll back the dangerous bankrupting deficit which is adding significantly to our crushing debt; not a freeze on spending at insane levels that continue our death march to oblivion. These deficits are Radical not Conservative. If they were needed to defend our freedoms in wartime that’s one thing, then we would have to go for broke; but they serve no purpose other than growing the size of government at the expense of our freedoms. Moving to the Right can only mean one thing: Shrinking the size and scope of government. We don’t vehemently oppose Obama because we hate him personally. We oppose him and seek to wreck his plans because we love our liberty and great prosperity.
 
O'Reilly is reading way too much into Obama's proposal and has fallen for his trick. Hopelessly hoping that the Michael Jackson of American politics is growing up (see); that he's ending his love affair with himself, big government and the Neverland radical Left; that heeding the lesson of Massachusetts and a protracted economic mess O'Reilly is hoping that Obama's spending freeze is the real deal; that it's the first step toward significant deficit cuts and saving the republic from fiscal collapse. As for Obama fulfilling O’Reilly’s predictions and moving to the Right this has only happened in his head.

Postscript: Newt

In O'Reilly's debate with Newt Gingrich last night that Obama's proposed spending freeze is moving him to the Right Newt was suspicious that it is all a big lie. Then silencing O'Reilly Newt finally said that if the President vetoes the $80 billion jobs bill, which would add to the deficit if signed into law, then we'll know that he's real about a spending freeze.

Newt is correct! If Obama is serious about a freeze then he can fund the $80 billion from the $500 billion in unspent stimulus funds. But I'll bet the barn that Obama does do it as he is determined to spend and spend and spend thinking with Krugman, Reich and the statist Left that it's the only way out of this economic morass (see).
.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BRAIN ON ICE: BARACK OBAMA'S SPENDING FREEZE (REVISED AND EXPANDED)



        Brain on ice. Image of Obama's frozen brain.

In his State of a Less Perfect Union speech tomorrow the Great Depressor, who is everywhere making things worse, is to announce his bold new plan to freeze out of control spending at its current out of control levels; which means that spending will still be in the stratosphere driving us toward bankruptcy and depression.
 
Meanwhile the nutballs at Huffington Post and Daily Kos are comparing Obama's proposal to the "heartless, do nothing" policies of Herbert Hoover who before FDR was the biggest spending liberal President in US peacetime history* (Hooverism was the New Deal in embryo as Harold Ickes said). Indeed, the crazies are sounding the alarm and warning Obama about a reapeat of the catastrophe of 1937 when FDR scaled back spending prior to the New Deal crashing and the economy plunging into a new recession (within the Depression)-when millions lost jobs in the private sector due, in reality, to the Wagner Act, one million business crippling strike hours, collective bargaining, punishing corporate taxes and the minimum wage-all converging to collapse the stock market then the economy. The causal relationship between this downturn and spending cuts has never been proved or adequately explained, and never will. 
 
* In the 1932 election campaign FDR ran as a fiscal conservative against Hoover's run away spending and huge deficits only to outspend Hoover once in office. Hoover's policies turned a recession started by the Federal Reserve into the Depression; then FDR, who was Hoover on steroids, needlessly prolonged the Depression for many years with his ruinous failed New Deal. 

The Left is howling that Obama is moderating and being Hooverized, Clintonized and triangularized when in fact he's settling for a lesser degree of spending psychosis that has FDR and Keynes himself rolling in their graves. Not everyone in the loony bin are equally insane. There are ultra-diehard Keynesian crackpots like Paul Krugman and Robert Reich*, more extreme than Obama calling for an escalation in stimulus spending, who make him seem normal, mainstream and sane. It's a bogus Obama make over game, like his tough Nobel Prize neo-con speech at Oslo-another smile and lie routine to fool the folks into thinking that he's one of them and not elitist; that he's  riding the wave of public outrage over spending and soaring deficits. The times call for radical change in priorities and direction (not deception) which is what Scott Brown, New Jersey and Virginia were about. Not tone deaf but brain dead. Obama has a frozen brain stuck in a past that is perishing.
 
*These men are crackpots believing in what I call Hocus Pocus Economics: The magical and mystical blind faith based belief that government can barrow, spend and tax its way out of economic difficulties. Ask these men for one historical example proving their theory and they say that it has nerver truly been put into practice because no government to date has spent the money needed to make it work, including the trillions spent by the Three Blind Mice: Obama, Pelosi and Reid.
 
For insight into Hooverism read my short piece: THE GREAT DEPRESSION OF THE 1920S: WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE WILSONIZING OF HIS PRESIDENCY


   
Was Ohio the first step toward the Wilsonizing of the Obama Presidency? Will Obama’s rejected agenda become his obsessive League of Nations exhausting him and possibility ruining his health in a national campaign to sell it to the public?
 
Recall what I wrote here months ago on the significance of Obama's middle name "Hussein" being one of many keys to understanding his character and tragic fate. For he shares with the dead Iraqi dictator of that name not his cruel and violent nature, as Obama is a civilized man, but his stiff necked intransigence and ruinous resistance to reason and change. In fact, if it weren't for Saddam's intransigence, if he had honored his agreements, complied with the UN and hadn't played strategic games with WMDs, he might still be in power with Obama in the Senate and Hillary as President. For Obama rode the tide of anti-Iraq war sentiment to victory first over Hillary and then John McCain-with help from a wounded economy.

Just as Saddam was stuck on stupid wrongly believing it was his destiny to become king and master of the Arab Middle East, restoring the "superior" Arab race it to its ancient glory as a great world power so too is Obama destructively stuck on his radical big government agenda and there's no ungluing him. Struck deaf, dumb and blind by the egalitarian ideal which gives his life purpose and meaning, having defined his political career for twenty years, Obama will steadfastly continue his reckless course on the economy, foreign policy and national security driving America into deeper debt and greater peril from enemies.

Indeed, the angry, pathetic delusional Obama that we saw in Ohio on Friday is the beginning of his "doubling down;" the redoubling of his efforts to succeed with his dream to fundamentally and foundationally transform this country. In this he resembles Woodrow Wilson, our first law professor in chief, in his national campaign on the League of Nations which ruined his health and destroyed his presidency.

Obama like Wilson and Saddam Obama will never give up, never give in, never admit defeat. No triangulation, as no flexible, pragmatic Bill Clinton is in him; but intransigence and confrontation fighting on to the bitter end. Indeed, after giving his speech in Ohio where he used the word “fight” twenty times Obama visited a sporting goods store where he picked up a football helmet and said to the cameras and crowd that he would need it for his State of the Union speech. Obama is committed to roughing it out and staying his disastrous course hoping in the end he’ll save his presidency and pride and score a touchdown.

Obama is certain that he's in the right, that God and history are on his side in his fight to remake and transform America. In fact, he is certain that in time history will vindicate him (as Wilson believed about the League); that Americans will eventually see the light and appreciate what he's done-or tried to do-for generations to come.

In Obama's pathological leftwing mind Socialism is the only way left for America. It's SOCIALISM OR BUST! Everything else has been tried. Obama is a true believer in his bankrupt New Deal/Great Society radical 60s leftist creed. And so BUST it will be for his big government cause, 60's world view and anti-Reagan presidency-taking down the radical Left as he falls.

Postscript: On George Will’s Mandate to Moderate

In his column in Sunday's Townhall George Will wrote that the Massachusetts miracle of Scott Brown's victory over the Kennedy legacy freed Obama from "the curse of the 60" in the US Senate and that the populist rage against his progressive agenda gave him a "mandate to moderate" that he should heed. But this sage advice is wasted on Obama as there is no George Will in him. Obama is not the rational, sensible, grown up human being that Will would have him be. As Obama has learned nothing from the tragedies and disasters of Liberalism’s past, be it the failed New Deal or the War on Poverty or the more recent spread the wealth housing credit collapse so he’s learning nothing from the electorate’s rejection of his leftwing plans. The fault doesn’t lie in Obama and his agenda-all of humanity and history is crying out for America‘s remaking; the fault lies in the American people with their guns, religion (other than Islam) and small minded self-centered lives. Bill Maher faulting America for not blindly following Obama said that “Americans are stupid.” Obama agreeing with Meher will not yield to national stupidity but maintain his false integrity.

Barack Hussein Obama, the man with the dead Iraqi leader's last name, (a man driven by hubris and ideology to destruction) believes he has a mandate from heaven (he is "partner's with God") to fight on for the cause of destructive big government budget busting Liberalism. Obama will not triangulate or moderate or turn into a Clintonite. He’ll continue to resist giving Bill and Hillary the job as mentors-in-chief. For twenty years he has lived for one idea that one day he’d be president and that Providence would give him the chance, the great “defining moment“, to transformationally change America and radically alter its course. No way in hell is Obama going to throw away the chance of twenty lifetimes because of a Senate race gone awry or the loss of Virginia and New Jersey.

My God, what would the Kennedy clan say if Obama gave up the “dream” that’s supposed to "live on" until the “more perfect Union” becomes reality? The torch Obama received when the Kennedys crowned him the “new JFK,” what would it mean if he suddenly extinguished its flame and became like the Clintons who he beat with Ted Kennedy's help? To do so would dishonor the memory of his kingmaker, mentor and friend. Obama discarding his core beliefs for political expediency and throwing his world view under the train is out of the question. Rev. Wright and his grandmother were expendable, but not the ideology that defines his existence, his reason for living. Like Salvador Allende who preferring confrontation to moderation went down in flames defending Socialism with a gun Obama will stick to his guns and fight on the prisoner of a tragic fate.

This intransigent, foolish, vainglorious man who sees himself as savior of the radical Left and centuries of failed revolutions and experiments is “doubling down” for the ideological fight of the ages-the apocalyptic battle for America‘s future between Right and Left. Because of Scott Brown’s victory the Senate is now free of a Democrat super majority of 60; but this 60s born man with his leftist heart and brain isn’t free from the CURSE OF THE SIXTIES.

 

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

APOLLO ANSWERS FABIUS CUNCTATOR



God creates and directs the mortal world according to His benevolent plans, giving the events of human history a rich symbolic meaning.

In the Comments section of Barack Obama and the "Curse" of the Kennedys Fabius Cunctator writes in condemnation of me and my method of interpreting events:

Numerology, Divination and the Future

1) God is in control. He determines the rise and fall of Nations and of men.

2) If we live according to God’s will, He will bless us and our Nation.

3) The future is not determined by the perceived coincidence between the dates of past events and the birth dates of historical figures connected with those events.

4) Numerology, sorcery, divination, and wizardry that are used to predict the fate of men and the course of history or events are condemned in the Bible.

The making of predictions based on numerology has the implication that mere number manipulation has the power to determine the mind of God and that God has given numerologists the special status of being His messengers to communicate warnings to other lesser mortals. Hence, numerologists seek the adulation of men through their number manipulation and by the implication that they are capable of understanding how God, through numerical omens, is warning us of future events.

5) Numerologists are in danger of the wrath of God because they are prophesying according to their imaginations and not on the basis of the teachings of the Bible or on special directions directly from God. In other words, numerologists are adding to prophesy in contradiction to the Bible which condemns this practice.

6) Finally, numerology implies that men are constrained by a preordained plan for the future, and those men; therefore, do not have free will which makes them responsible for their actions

ApolloSpeaks replies:

Please reconcile for us your belief in a God who determines, wills, ordains (predetermines, preordains) the rise and fall of nations-meaning their destiny and purpose in history-with your implied belief that individual heads of state-especiallly powerful and influential states like America-are somehow exempt from or unconstrained by (because of free will) the overarching, predetermined destiny of the nations they lead. 

My vision for America and its leaders is simple: As no American President is greater than this nation, and America is not greater than Almighty God and His invincible plans then whatever be God's Will for America's exceptional destiny is that leader's inescapable fate (free will and all). That goes for Obama as it did for George Bush, and you or I if we were President.

In the work that I'm doing on the anti-Reagan, pro-Islamic (see), secular progressive Barack Obama, the first President since Reagan to win office on a November 4th election date where he broke two powerful, converging Republican election cycles rooted in the 19th century (which I'll soon be writing about), I have discovered an impending, divinely willed catastrophe* which our nation must endure for its renewal, salvation and destiny-our destiny of liberty and mankind's best hope as "the shinning city on a hill."

*The national shock treatment of Obama and the Democrats isn't over. The first year of this administration is prelude. Obama and the Dems aren't through taking a wrecking ball to our economy, foreign policy and national security.

If these are the thoughts of an evil, wicked, satanic sorcerer then all those patriotic Americans of deep religious faith who look for signs and omens of hope and grace, of God's directing hand in the chaotic whirl of events, are in trouble with Him.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (22) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BARACK OBAMA AND THE "CURSE" OF THE KENNEDYS (WITH A POSTSCRIPT ON MARTHA COAKLEY) (READ IN FULL SCREEN)

 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction:

Ted Kennedy and Robert Novak: A Tale of Two Seizures

Chapters

1. The Day the Kennedys Endorsed Obama

2. JFK and the Day Obama was Born

3. The New JFK and the Second Coming of
    Camelot
 
4. The Forty Year Trajectory in the Restoration of
    Camelot
 
5. The Kennedyizing of Obama and the
    Murder of JFK

     Barack Obama’s Chart of Tragic Destiny

6. 1932, 1960 and President at Age 47

7. RFK’s Assassination and other Signs
    of Obama’s “Kennedy Curse”

   The Ominous Meeting of Obama and Clinton at Dianne
   Feinstein’s Home

   Obama’s Choice of Joe Biden as VP

   Caroline Kennedy’s Birth and Ted Kennedy’s Name

   Ted Kennedy’s Inaugural Seizure

   Robert Novak’s Seizure and the Anniversary of JFK’s Death

   The Ominous Sign of 177

   West Point, Vietnam and Afghanistan and the number 177

   The Day Ted Kennedy Died

  Conclusion: The Fatal Star of Socialism
 
  Postscript: Martha Coakley's Defeat and the Fate of 
  Obama's Egalitarian Dreams
 

INTRODUCTION
 
TED KENNEDY AND ROBERT NOVAK: A TALE OF TWO SEIZURES
 
 
On May 17, 2008 a 76 year old Ted Kennedy suffered a near fatal brain seizure while in his home at Hyannisport caused by a cancerous tumor on the left side of his brain. 71 days later on July 27th while vacationing with his wife and family conservative columnist Bob Novak suffered a seizure from the same type of tumor also located on the left side of his brain. Amazingly and incredibly Novak was vacationing at his daughter’s summer home at Cape Code where Kennedy lived and had his attack. Mere coincidence and happenstance? I think not. Just as Novak was geographically close to Kennedy’s home when he was stricken the two men, both Roman Catholic, were close in age with their birthdays separated by just 4 days (see note 1). For Novak and Kennedy were born in the early 1930s when the U.S. economy collapsed into a deep and agonizing depression-with Novak born February 26, 1931 and Kennedy one year later on February 22nd, the year FDR captured the presidency.

Note to the reader: This work was started shortly after Election Day 2008 when Kennedy and Novak were still alive. Amazingly, both men were born in the same month of February one year apart; were stricken with brain cancer in the same year 71 days apart while physically located at Cape Code several miles apart; moreover, they died within 7 days of each other in August with Novak leaving us on August 18th 14 days from Obama’s 48th birthday and Kennedy 7 days later 21 days from Obama’s birthday.

Could it be that the physical collapse of these two Depression-born men, stemming from the same terrible cause, prophetically signals the fate of the economy in the months and years ahead? The economy under the anti-Capitalist, anti-growth, deficit spending leftist policies of Barack Hussein Obama and the big government Democrats in Congress? Policies which wrongly and fatally focus on the spending and spreading of wealth instead of its creation? and have many Americans alarmed and up in arms because of the soaring deficit, gargantuan debt and threat of national bankruptcy*?

*As 71 days separated Kennedy and Novak’s tumor attacks it is interesting to note that this number is a factor of 213 (3x) a number that gives us the date 2-13 or February 13th, the ominous day that the Senate passed Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment (Stimulus) Act; a predictably failed attempt to end the recession and turn the economy around as it didn‘t work for Hoover or FDR (the New Deal was Hooverism on steroids) or for Japan after 20 years of stimulus spending, monetizing debt and infrastructure projects.

Ideologically Kennedy and Novak are polar opposites having nothing in common except on foreign policy: for both were neo-isolationists opposing America’s interventionist policies, global hegemony and “empire” of military bases, the cornerstone of international order and stability. Indeed, both men opposed intervention in Iraq to topple Saddam Hussein wrongly warning George Bush that it would become his Vietnam and South East Asia catastrophe. Opposition to the war was Barack Obama’s ticket to presidential history with Kennedy being his kingmaker-his endorsement was crucial to Obama beating Hillary in the primaries and winning his party’s nomination. Novak was born in Joliet, Illinois just south of Chicago, Obama‘s home town-the first Democrat in history from Illinois to win the presidency (see note 2).

Could it be that Novak’s and Kennedy’s malady portend a coming disaster for Iraq with their forecasts of a new Vietnam belatedly coming true? In other words, could Iraq with its fragile security gains and it’s failure at achieving religious and ethnic reconciliation collapse into pre-surge chaos during Obama’s weak and feckless presidency? A presidency aspiring ideologically to end US world hegemony and the Pax Americana (see) ? Kennedy’s brain seizure more than Novak’s indicates that this is likely to happen with the blame falling on Obama and the political Left*.

*Tim Johnson’s brain seizure in 2006 during a teleconference with reporters on Iraq and his release from hospital care on Vietnam Liberation Day in 2007 gave us what I believe was a prophetic pairing of Iraq and Vietnam as a warning sign of things to come for the Middle East and US foreign policy in the Obama era (see). .Oddly, in the 110th Congress Johnson and Kennedy were listed alphabetically back to back on the Senate roster.

Indeed, the day of Kennedy’s physical collapse-a soft-on-terror senator weak on military, defense and security issues-was no ordinary day; in fact, it was an important military day: the 58th celebration of Armed Forces Day when the nation honors the four branches of its military-not a good sign for the two wars we are waging abroad or for world peace (see note 3).

Even more extraordinary and related to the military and coming setbacks is that Kennedy’s illness fell on the day when one of our greatest living military heroes was celebrating his 28th wedding anniversary. That hero was Vietnam vet and presidential candidate John McCain-a man defeated and captured by North Vietnam and sentenced to five years of torture and terror in communist prisoner hell (see note 4).

Did the unfortunate collapse of Kennedy’s and Novak’s health from left-sided brain tumors prefigure the political victory of the ideologically diseased politically correct Left over conservatism, right reason and sound judgment in domestic and foreign affairs, with Kennedy’s malady foreshadowing the failure of McCain’s campaign-a campaign where McCain lost to a radical leftist senator destined, so it seems, to collapse our economy and foreign policy and put this nation through hell? It certainly looks that way. It looks like our moral and mental mess of a leader is blundering his way into a catastrophic presidency as bad as anything we have seen; a destructively failed presidency prefigured by Kennedy’s near fatal collapse and left-sided brain seizure-which ominously recurred on Inauguration Day, an awful, inauspicious way to start a presidency*. But Obama’s impact on the economy and foreign policy is not the subject of this work**. This and much more will be intricately explored in my work: The Rise and Fall of Barack Obama and The End of the Secular Progressive Left. What follows is limited to exploring Obama’s connection to Ted Kennedy and his tragic, ill-starred clan; and especially his link to JFK of whom the Kennedys see Obama as the latest incarnation and savior of the Left.

*Especially inauspicious for Obamacare and healthcare reform. When Kennedy died in August in the middle of the healthcare debate the dream of a nationalized system died with him.

**This much I will predict: after four disastrous years of the Obama Doctrine in national security and foreign policy the neo-isolationists on the Left and Right (Progressives and Paleos, the Kennedys and Novaks) will be thoroughly discredited as the chaos Obama unleashes will cause new appreciation for the Pax Americana.

CHAPTER 1. THE DAY THE KENNEDYS ENDORSED OBAMA
 
Ted Kennedy, senior senator from Massachusetts, endorsed Obama’s bid for the 44th presidency on January 28th, the 28th day of 2008, from the campus of American University in Washington DC. The location itself would be of no interest except that its address corresponds to Kennedy’s home state and the number of the presidency Obama was seeking. For the university’s address is 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, the number 44 without the zeros.

Remarkably, on June 17, 1963, from that very same campus 44 years earlier, John Kennedy delivered a graduation day speech on the subject of war and world peace. Why is this remarkable? Apart from the speech occurring 44 years before Obama’s endorsement by Kennedy, JFK was 28 months and 28 days into his short lived presidency, hence:

January 20, 1961 (JFK’s inauguration) to June 17, 1963 (JFK’s American University speech)=2 years, 4 months and 28 days, or 28 months and 28 days.

In other words, Ted Kennedy’s endorsement of Obama and JFK’s speech not only gives us the same location but the same two numbers 44 and 28 numbers important to this study and key to understanding Obama‘s presidential destiny.

2. JFK AND THE DAY OBAMA WAS BORN

Now just as Ted Kennedy endorsed Barack Obama’s bid to be the 44th president on the 28th day of the year in 2008 so was Obama born 67 days into JFK’s 44th year on the 28th week of his presidency, hence:

May 29, 1917 (JFK’s birth) to August 4, 1961 (Obama’s birth)=44 years and 67 days.

January 20, 1961 (JFK’s inaugural) to August 4, 1961 (Obama’s birth)=196 days or 28 weeks.

So in addition to the numbers 44 and 28 we now have a third number 67 as part of a numeric equation for unraveling the mystery and future course of Obama’s presidency.

Now here is where is gets profound and very inauspicious for the president: for just as Obama was born 67 days into JFK’s 44th year, which was the 28th week of his short and tragic presidency, so on the day the Kennedys endorsed Obama’s candidacy, the 28th day of January, it was 67 days into the 44th anniversary of JFK’s death, hence:

November 22, 2007 (44th anniversary of JFK’s death) to January 28, 2008 (Kennedys endorse Obama)=67 days.

Is it not remarkable that 67 days into JFK’s 44th year on the 28th week of his presidency a future president is born the 44th in our history endorsed by JFK‘s younger brother on the 28th day of 2008, 67 days into the 44th anniversary of JFK‘s death?

Could the chaotic play of blind chance have randomly arranged these precise numeric pairings and patterns? I think not. The "coincidences" are too many and the precision too mathematically exact to be anything less than the signature effect of a Higher Power (the Great Architect and Mathematician of the Universe) guiding our Republic by a Master Plan and warning us in advance about the tragic course of Obama’s failing presidency. But there’s more, much more showing the hand of Providence in Obama’s rise to power especially in the last presidential race:

For just as Ted Kennedy suffered his brain seizure on John McCain’s 28th wedding anniversary (see introduction), and Obama’s day of birth fell on the 67th day of JFK’s 44th year (on the 28th week of his presidency) so did Obama defeat McCain in the race for the 44th presidency exactly 67 days from McCain’s 72nd birthday, hence:

August 29, 1939 (McCain’s birth) to November 4, 2008 (Election Day)=72 years and 67 days.

Moreover, and quite amazingly, when we subtract JFK’s age on the date of Obama’s birth from McCain’s age when he lost to Obama (the birth of his presidency) the difference is exactly 28 years, hence:

 72 (McCain’s age when defeated by Obama)
-44 (JFK’s age when Obama was born)
 28

Perhaps more than any significant number in Barack Obama’s extraordinary political career 28 stands out as the most important as it signifies his election victory in 2008. But the numeric signs surrounding Obama’s campaign and presidential victory (evidence of Intelligent Design in his candidacy and presidency) is a subject for another day which I will explore in a separate work. Suffice it to say that the number 28 is a numeric sign auspicious of Obama’s electoral fortunes*. And just as Obama was born in the 44th year of JFK’s life, 28 weeks into his ill-starred presidency, so, it seems, was he destined from birth to be endorsed by the Kennedys for the 44th presidency and by doing so incur the proverbial “Kennedy curse” on his leadership**.

* On January 28, 2008 the Obama presidency was born-or in its embryonic stage-as the Kennedy endorsement gave Obama the edge that he needed to defeat Hillary Clinton in the primaries.

**Obama’s ill-fated presidency and so-called “curse” will become more evident to the reader in the fifth, sixth and seventh chapters of this work.

CHAPTER 3. THE NEW JFK AND THE SECOND COMING OF CAMELOT
 
 
In the historic election of Barack Obama there was a sense of inevitability as the political Left for decades have been aching for a “new JFK” to renew the promise and dream-real or imagined-that was cut short and ruined by Kennedy’s terrible death. And now he’s here, as many want to believe, with a little Martin Luther King and a lot of LBJ thrown in.

Indeed, it seems that unseen forces* were at work when Obama became the new darling of the Kennedy clan with the senator endorsing his candidacy in the hope that the 44th presidency would be the second coming of his murdered brother, the coming of Camelot II, the “dream” reborn (the socialist dream) coming at last to fruition in America (see note 5).

*Meaning supernatural forces.

For the man who was born on August 4th and won the presidency on November 4th, giving us the number 44, was also the 4th aspirant to Camelot II* to seek the presidency since JFK’s death, and the only one to succeed (see note 6). In fact, there is a kind of historic progression or trajectory of events in Obama’s unprecedented success as you will see in what follows:

*It is interesting to note that Ted Kennedy is the 4th and last of the Kennedy brothers having lived just long enough to help Obama to the presidency.

4. THE FORTY YEAR TRAJECTORY IN THE RESTORATION OF CAMELOT

First, pro-Israeli presidential candidate Bobby Kennedy (first aspirant to Camelot II) is murdered in cold blood by a Palestinian gunman before he could finish his primary race in 1968.

Then going one step further than his murdered brother Ted Kennedy, without incident, took the 1980 Democratic primaries as far as he could go until he lost to Jimmy Carter in mid-March of that year ending his race of all places in the state of Illinois (see note 7).

Next, John F. Kerry in 2004 surpassing his mentor Ted Kennedy defeats his Democratic rivals to win his party’s nomination, but falls just short of reaching the goal when he loses to George Bush in a fairly close election.

Now after 40 years of failure and three defeated candidates and aspirants to Camelot Barack Obama (the most Leftist of the four) triumphs over all; and winning both the primaries and the presidency reaches the goal and becomes the 44th president, the age of John Kennedy when he was born-at a troubling time in history. All very strange, very true and directed, so I believe, by a Higher Power as you may gather from the marvels that follow:

CHAPTER 5. THE KENNEDYIZING OF OBAMA AND THE MURDER OF JFK

When JFK was murdered by Lee Harvey Oswald for his patriotic anti-Communism and threat to Castro’s Cuba he was age 46: the same age as Obama when Ted Kennedy endorsed his candidacy, and one year younger than Obama when he became 44th president. It’s as though Obama was ready to retrieve the torch dropped by the 46 year old Kennedy and continue in some way his presidency-continuing where his presidency abruptly left off.

But here is where it gets profound and indicates, I believe, the hand of Providence telling us in what way Obama is continuing JFK’s presidency:

     BARACK OBAMA’S CHART OF TRAGIC DESTINY

                                   JFK’s Death

    JFK’S                                                               JFK’S
46th Birthday                                                  47th Birthday

5-29-63>  177 Days    <11-22-63>   189 Days  <5-29-64

                                        44 Years

8-4-07>    177 Days     <1-28-08>    189 Days   < 8-4-08 

   Obama’s                                                            Obama’s
46th Birthday                                                   47th Birthday 
                         
                        Kennedys Endorse Obama
 
This remarkable chart (which I published on this blog months ago, see), indicates, I believe, that it is Barack Obama’s destiny to suffer tragically in office and that this fate is rooted in the date of his anointing by Ted and Caroline Kennedy-a date that sealed his fate to become President of the United States. For that date January 28, 2008, when Caroline said she heard her father’s voice in Obama’s words, is numerically and ominously rooted in November 22, 1963 the awful day of JFK’s death, the day that shook the world. Let me explain:

On November 22, 1963 when Kennedy was assassinated at age 46 it was 189 days short of his 47th birthday, the age at which Obama, the “black Kennedy,” won election and became our first Afro-American president, hence:

November 22, 1963 to May 29, 1964 (Kennedy’s 47th birthday)=189 days.

Amazingly and Providentially, denoting a fateful or fatal bond between these two men, exactly 189 days short of Obama’s 47th birthday brings us to the date January 28th, the politically significant and providential day in 2008 when Ted and Caroline Kennedy, John Kennedy’s last surviving brother and child, blessed Obama’s candidacy practically anointing him the “new JFK,” hence:

January 28, 2008 (date of Kennedy’s endorsement) to August 4, 2008 (when Obama turned 47)=189 days.

But there’s more suggesting divine intervention in Obama’s candidacy, victory and inextricable ties to the unfortunate “accursed” Kennedys. For when JFK was tragically murdered he was 177 days into his 46th year, hence:

May 29, 1963 (JFK’s 46th birthday) to November 22, 1963 (JFK’s death)=177 days.

Inconceivably and incredibly, the 177th day of Barack Obama’s 46th year once again links him to the Kennedys: for that 177th day converges with the fateful date January 28th, the day Obama was Kennedyized and Kennedyism-the need some have for a charismatic leader like JFK to venerate and idolize-was reborn, hence:

August 4, 2007 (Obama’s 46th birthday) to January 28, 2008 (the day Obama was Kennedyized)=177 days.

Amazingly, we have seen that 28 days into the year 2008 Barack Obama is made heir apparent to JFK’s legacy (a tragic legacy) anointed by John Kennedy’s only surviving brother and child-with up to fifteen members of the Kennedy clan present; anointed from the campus of a university-with an address corresponding to the 44th presidency-where the 35th president gave a major foreign policy speech 44 years earlier and 28 months and days into his administration.

We also saw that there was an unmistakable interconnection between the day of Obama’s birth, the JFK presidency and the defeat of John McCain for the 44th presidency.

Now we see that Obama’s bond with the Kennedys and JFK is ominous of coming woe to Obama personally and to the nation*: for the number of days separating January 28, 2008 from Barack Obama’s 46th and 47th birthdays equally match the number of days separating November 22, 1963-the day of Kennedy’s death-from JFK’s 46th and 47th birthdays. Moreover, the number of years separating JFK’s murder from Obama’s anointing by the Kennedys was 44, the number of Obama’s presidency, hence:

November 22, 1963 to January 28, 2008=44 years, 2 months and 6 days.

*The period following JFK’s death was one of the most culturally divisive and tumultuous in American history. As this was a period of assassinations, mass protests, civil disobedience and violence its not an historical accident that Barack Obama is our first 60s born President as he is both a sign and a cause of coming national turmoil.

The probability of these numeric patterns and convergences occurring randomly, fortuitously and undesigned is less than zero. While they all point ominously to a tragic fate for Obama and his presidency, willed, I believe, by Divine Necessity for the greater good and progress of our Republic, the true meaning and nature of this tragedy will be revealed in the fullness of time. Whether there be a Sword of Damocles hanging over Obama’s head ready to fall at a fatal hour, as happened to JFK in Dallas, or whether his presidency will simply bleed to death by a thousand cuts as happened to LBJ (with Obama refusing to run for a second term), is impossible to tell; for as the reader will see in the “Rise and Fall of Barack Obama” the president has a powerful bond to LBJ as well.

But let us continue as I have more to say on the uncanny connection between Obama and the Kennedys.

CHAPTER 6. 1932, 1960 AND PRESIDENT AT AGE 47

Just as Obama’s presidential destiny seems inextricably linked to the fate and fortunes of the Kennedys, a family heartbreakingly plagued by assassinations, disease, death by accidents, addictions and encounters with the law-believed in popular culture to be specially cursed-it so happens that JFK, who was 44 when Obama was born, ran for the presidency in 1960, the 44th presidential contest in U.S. history*. Amazingly, at the time of his brother’s victory Ted Kennedy, who backed Obama on January 28th to be 44th president, was 260 days into his 28th year, hence:

February 22, 1932 (Ted Kennedy’s birth) to November 8, 1960 (Election Day)=28 years.

*Dwight Eisenhower’s reelection in 1956 was the 43rd presidential contest in history.

This I believe is further proof that 28, for a mysterious Providential reason*, is Obama’s number of success and victory in presidential politics**-a victory anticipated, so it seems, not only by his Kennedyizing on January 28th and his birth on the 28th week of JFK’s presidency, but by the date of his acceptance speech at the Democratic Convention. For this date fell on the 28th day of August (see note 8)***.

*The meaning of the second perfect number 28 within the context of this work will be fully explained in The Rise and Fall of Barack Obama.

*On February 17th when Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act it was the 28th day of his presidency: January 20th to February 17=28 days. This was Obama’s signature economic initiative.

**As 28 was a numeric sign auspicious for Obama’s presidential hopes let’s not forget Ted Kennedy’s ominous seizure on McCain’s 28th wedding anniversary prefiguring Obama’s victory over McCain and the collapse of the Democratic Left, It was McCain’s good fortune that he lost the election as economic conditions beyond his control, now being aggravated by Obama and the Democrats, would have made him a failed one term president with Obama coming back to defeat him in 2012 (see ).

As for the number 28 it is fascinating to note that Kennedy’s anointing of Obama was withheld until 28 days into 2008 the number 28 with two intervening zeros-the year of Obama’s destined victory. Moreover, and very relevant, 28 just happens to be the numerical value of the words New Deal*, hence:

NEW DEAL
555 4513=28 (see note 10)

*Obamanomics has been called the new New Deal as it follows FDR’s stimulus spending policies and corruption in using taxpayers money for political paybacks to special interests and the reelection of allies.

It is simply amazing that the number 28 should have such oracular significance for Obama’s political fortunes and that the New Deal, with a numeric value of 28, should be the model for his economic recovery plan.

Even more fascinating is that 28 is a factor in the numbers 1932 and 1960, the years of Ted Kennedy’s birth and JFK’s election as president, hence:

28x69=1932
28x70=1960 (see note 9).

As the year 1932 not only saw the birth of Ted Kennedy but of FDR’s presidency* and the failed New Deal this, I believe, is a sign foreshadowing the fate of Obama’s mega New Deal/Keynesian stimulus program (this will be explored in The Rise and Fall of Barack Obama).

*Perhaps it’s more accurate to say that the election of a new president is his conception and inauguration day his birth.

Now as Ted Kennedy was age 28 when JFK won the 44th presidential race in U.S. history and he endorsed Obama on the 28th day of the year it so happens that the number of years separating these two events is 47 Obama’s age when he won election, hence:

November 8, 1960 (JFK’s election) to January 28, 2008 (Kennedy’s endorsement)=47 years, 2 months and 20 days*.

And lastly, 28 is a factor of the number 56 2x, the number of the presidential race in 2008.*

*If chance is the cause of these numeric patterns and signs then chance, as Anatole France once said, is another name for God.

7. RFK’S ASSASSINATION AND OTHER SIGNS OF OBAMA’S “KENNEDY CURSE.”

Other portents indicating the fatal, ill-starred, tragic bond between Obama and the Kennedys are as follows:

1. The first post-primary meeting with New York Senator Hillary Clinton on June 5th:

This meeting fell on the 40th anniversary of New York Senator Robert Kennedy’s assassination held in the home of Dianne Feinstein-who became mayor of San Francisco in the late 1970s upon the shooting death of her predecessor, George Mascone. Kennedy was shot in California, the state Feinstein represents in the Senate (see ).

2. Obama’s choice of Joe Biden as VP:

Biden was born on November 20, 1942 the day Bobby Kennedy (born 11-20-1925) celebrated his 17th birthday. Biden’s age at the time of 65 corresponds to the date June 5th, or 6-5 when Kennedy was shot.

As Obama, with Kennedy’s help, rode the wave of anti-Iraq War sentiment to his party’s nomination it is fascinating to note that when the war began on March 19, 2003 (stateside) Sirhan Sirhan (RFK’s killer, born 3-19-1944) was celebrating his 59th birthday from his prison cell. Sirhan is now 65 years old.

Note: Ending the Vietnam War was the central plank of RFK’s presidential campaign. That he was murdered by an Arab fanatic born on a day destined to be famous as the start of the Iraq War may in some strange way be prophetic of Iraq turning into a new Vietnam for U.S. foreign policy. This idea will be taken up and fully explored in The Rise and Fall of Barack Obama.

3. Caroline Kennedy’s birth and Ted Kennedy’s name:

As Caroline was one of two Kennedys to anoint Obama’s candidacy for the 44th presidency it so happens that the number of months separating her birth from that of Obama’s are 44, hence:

November 27, 1957 (Caroline Kennedy’s birth) to Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961=3 years, 8 months and 7 days or 44 months*.

As Ted Kennedy was the other Kennedy to anoint Obama it just so happens that his name has a numerical value of 44, hence

TED KENNEDY
254 2555547=44 (see note 10).

4. Ted Kennedy’s Inaugural Seizure

As Ted Kennedy’s collapse from his malady in May 2008 was repeated at Obama’s inaugural it so happens that the two mishaps were separated by 248 days or 35 weeks, the presidency number of the fallen JFK, hence:

May 17, 2008 (Kennedy’s first collapse) to January 20, 2009 (Kennedy’s second collapse)=248 days, or 35 weeks*.

*Ironically, 35 is a factor in the numbers 280 (28 without the zero) and (like 28) 1960, the year JFK became the 35th president-elect, hence:

35x8=280
35x56=1960
28x70=1960

5. Robert Novak’s Seizure and the Anniversary of JFK’s Death.

Astonishingly, the same 248 days or 35 weeks separating Ted Kennedy’s two tumor attacks are the exact same number of days and weeks separating Bob Novak’s attack (in Ted Kennedy’s neighborhood of Cape Cod) to the 44th anniversary of JFK’s death, hence:

November 22, 2007 (44th anniversary of JFK’s death) to July 27, 2008 (Novak’s attack)=248 days or 35 weeks.

6. The Fatal Sign of 177

As 177 days separated John Kennedy’s 46th birthday from the day of his death, and the same number of days separate Obama’s 46th birthday from his anointing by the Kennedys (see chapter 5) amazingly it was 177 days after the 44th anniversary of JFK’s murder that Ted Kennedy suffered his near fatal brain seizure. This is another troubling sign that our fatally flawed 44th president is fated by Providence to meet with a tragic end in the physical sense or a tragically failed presidency, one of the worst in our history, hence:

November 22, 2007 to May 17, 2008 (Kennedy’s collapse)=177 days.

7. West Point, Vietnam and Afghanistan and the Number 177

John Kennedy addressed West Point on the Vietnam War on June 6, 1962. Obama addressed West Point on the Afghan War 47 years later on December 2, 2009. The number of days separating their speeches were 17,346 a number that is a multiple of 177 98x. Not a very good omen for Barack Obama and the Afghan War, hence:

June 6, 1962 (JFK’s West Point Speech) to December 2, 2009 (Obama’s West Point Speech)=47 years, 5 months and 26 days=17,346 days.

8. The Day Ted Kennedy Died

Ted Kennedy died 217 days into the Obama administration and 21 days after Barack Obama’s 48th birthday. The numbers 21 and 217 (multiples of 7) are factors of the highly significant number 1953. 1953 is significant because it indicates the year that John F. Kennedy began his career in the US Senate*.

*JFK was sworn in as senator on January 3, 1953.

Moreover, upon Ted Kennedy’s death he had spent a total of 46 years in the US Senate the life span of his brother John (whose Senate seat he won) and Obama‘s age when the Kennedys endorsed his candidacy.

*46 years, 9 months and 18 days.

Furthermore, John Kennedy entered the Senate in the waning days of the Truman administration; Ted Kennedy exited the Senate and this life in the early days of the Obama administration. Obama like Truman is a doublet number president, Truman being 33 and Obama 44. Every US president with doublet numbers, all Democrats, were one term presidents*.

*Polk (11), Cleveland (22), Truman (33) and Obama (44). Cleveland was also the 24th president having been a single term president twice.

And lastly, just as the 2008 presidential race was the 56th in our history Barack Obama's victory on November 4 was exactly 56 years to the date of John Kennedy's victory in the Massechusetts Senate race*"
 
*Kennedy defeated Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. on November 4, 1952.
 
CONCLUSION: THE FATAL STAR OF SOCIALISM
 
 
What was believed by the revolutionary Left to symbolize a brave new dawn of peace and justice for humanity became instead a bloodred star of death and destruction for millions.
 
The powerful bonds traced in this work between Barack Obama, JFK and his tragically fortunate family prophetically anticipates, I believe, an ill starred and tragically failed presidency perhaps of Kennedyesque proportions. However, the manner of Obama’s unfortunate end is impossible for me to divine. Either his presidency will be cut short like Harding’s or Kennedy’s (two senators turned president*) meeting with death by disease, accident or assassination; or he will go the way of LBJ ending his presidency a disillusioned and broken man his dream of “ a more perfect Union (LBJ‘s Great Society)” shattered by the folly of his policies and unwise plans.

*The only two sitting US senators before Obama that were voted into the White House.

But whatever be the manner of Obama’s unhappy end its cause will have nothing to do with a curse passed on by the Kennedy clan. For Obama’s uncanny (karmic) connection to the Kennedys is in reality a Providential sign of his unfortunate destiny; a warning to all that when Barack Obama falls it should not be seen as a random event or the work of some dark governmental or right wing conspiracy but as the Decree and Will of Heaven; decreed for the greater good of our Republic and its unfinished mission of freedom and justice in the world.

Indeed, if the Kennedys had backed Hillary Clinton in the primaries and Obama won his party’s nomination and the presidency all the same his fortunes would have remained unchanged, no different than they are now. For “character is destiny” as Heraclitus said; and like many of the fallen Kennedys who thought themselves “invincibly blessed, above human laws and protected by the gods,*“ Obama’s character is fatally flawed blindly driven to ruination by hubris, arrogance, ignorance and lies.

*Quoted from an author whose name escapes me.

But what makes Obama’s presidency especially cursed is that it operates under the baneful power of a fatal star; not a so-called “evil” planet such as astrologers use in their art; but the baneful star of socialism, “the greatest failed experiment in history;” a deranged ideology of social justice blindly based on feelings of compassion for deprived, oppressed and suffering human beings raised to an absolute principle of justice and solution for everything. It is this bankrupt ideology at war with God and man, at odds with America’s founding ideas, based on the fallacy of man’s right to material equality, that’s determining Obama’s tragic fate. Barack Obama is a sacrificial lamb destined to come to a grievous end for the good of the nation; to discredit the political and cultural Left, end the domestic ideological civil war and win the existential struggle with radical Islam; a sacrifice to waken America from sleep, forgetfulness and loss of faith and restore the spirit of truth, justice and liberty, the moral, cultural and philosophical traditions that made this country great. That is what’s at stake and why Obama’s tragic fate will work out for the best bringing renewal to America, victory over evil, long term prosperity and glorious success.
 
Postscript: Martha Coakley's Defeat and the Fate of Obama's Egalitarian Dreams (Added January 20)
 
Was it accidental irony or Providence in motion that a Massachusetts Senate seat held by Democrats for over half a century beginning with John Kennedy in 1953 was lost to a Kennedy backed candidate born that very year? For Martha Coakley came into this world on July 14, 1953 exactly 192 days into JFK's Senate career*.
 
Is it accidental irony or a Providential sign of coming success for Republicans in 2010 and 12 that the number 192 when multiplied by ten gives us the year 1920? For 1920 was a banner year for the GOP when they added the 29th Presidency to their control of Capital Hill, in what was to be an Era of Normalcy following the radical Wilson years.
 
And was it accident or Providence that the day Martha Coakley's birth on July 14, 1953 fell on the 164th anniversary of the French Revolution, the first egalitarian revolution in history of which Obama is heir? Could this be the last of many ominous signs denoting the fate of Obama's statist plans and egalitarian dream to Europeanize and Frenchify our capitalist country and make everything politically correct and green? Of this I have no doubt.

*January 3, 1953 (the start of JFK's Senate career) to July 14, 1953 (Martha Coakly's birth)=192 days.
 
 
NOTES:

1. Novak was a convert to Catholicism from Judaism.

2. Prior to Obama’s victory three Democrats from Illinois, born or residing there, ran for the presidency and failed: Stephen Douglas, William Jennings Bryan three times and Adlai Stevenson twice.

3. In my work “Barack Obama: Transformational President or Fortune’s Tragic Fool ? (see) I noted that the number 58 was a multiple of 1914 (58x33) the ominous year that ushered in World War I the “war to end all wars,” the war that foreshadowed the more deadly global conflict of World War II. In “Obama Maharaj Ji (see)” I noted that Obama’s “ A More Perfect Union Speech” coincided with the 139th anniversary of Neville Chamberlain’s birth*; and in “Biden Does Munich 2009 (see)” I noted that the administration’s first overseas conference on global security and foreign affairs was held at Munich, Germany on the 38th day of the year, a number corresponding to the ominous year 1938 when Hitler at Munich turned Neville Chamberlain into one of history’s biggest and deadliest fools. Following the Chamberlain analogy it appears that Obama’s dangerously weak, irresolute, politically correct presidency (he‘s perceived internationally as a “pushover“) is likely to turn the wars we are waging in Iraq and Afghanistan into much wider and more devastating conflicts.

*This was the first powerful sign of the Chamberlain-like role Obama was destined to play on the world stage.

4. John McCain was married to Cindy on May 17, 1980.

5. Upon losing the Democratic primary to Jimmy Carter Ted Kennedy in his concession speech uttered the famous words “the dream lives on,” meaning the socialist dream of economic equality which had little or nothing to do with JFK’s world view as he was a tax cutting supply sider in economics and a patriotic nationalist strong on national security and defense. As the Kennedy family moved leftward in their politics JFK became a leftist icon in the liberal imagination.

6. It is interesting to note that the number of days separating Obama’s 47th birthday and Election Day were 92. This is interesting because 92 is a factor in the number 1104 which gives us the date of Election Day, 11-04, hence:

August 4, 2008 (Obama’s 47th birthday) to November 4, 2008 (Election Day)=92 days.

92x12=1104

This I believe is a Providential sign that 2008 was precisely the right time in history for Obama to run for the presidency. There are many numeric signs indicating this for McCain which I will explore in “The Rise and Fall of Barack Obama” as McCain was a providential candidate whose candidacy has oracular significance for the challenging times ahead.

7. See Robert Novak’s “Prince of Darkness,” page 265).

8. When the important date August 28, 2008 is broken down into single digits and counted up it yields the number 28, hence:

8+2+8+2+8=28

On this date 44 years earlier the assassinated Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King gave his “I Have a Dream Speech” in Washington DC. It was also the day following the 100th anniversary of LBJ’s birth. I will have more to say on this in “The Rise and Fall of Barack Obama”.

Finally, MLK was assassinated on the date of April 4th. April being the 4th month gives us the numbers 4/4.

9. It is interesting to note that FDR’s and JFK’s victories occurred on November 8th 28 years apart and that 28 years prior to 1932 and 28 years after 1960 bring us to the elections of Theodore Roosevelt in 1904 and George H. W. Bush in 1988. The Roosevelts, Kennedys and Bushes are three of the four most powerful political families, or “dynasties” in American history.
 
10. The numerological table used in this work is as follows:
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (19) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE ADVENT OF THE HOMEGROWN TERRORIST


 
Abdul Hakim Muhammed and Nidal Hasan two homegrown jihadi gunmen foreshadowing more Moslem terror to come

HOMEGROWN TERRORIST
864579655     259969912=107 (see note 1)

I've written about the number 107 before. It corresponds to the historic date October 7 (10-7) when President Bush ordered the bombing of al Qaida and Taliban targets in Afghanistan and the Global War on Terror began. It is also the numeric value of the name Islamic Republic of Iran Islam's first jihadist state since the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the terrorist regime that began the Moslem holy war against our country when it seized the US embassy in Tehran and held 52 Americans hostage for 14 months (see).

Homegrown terrorism is an alarming and dangerous trend and there's been two deadly attacks on US soil since Obama took office; the first involving the murder of an Army private just three days before Obama's Moslem Outreach Speech in Cairo*; and the second the murder of 12 soldiers and one civilian at Ft. Hood. Ironically, as Obama has recklessly returned to the terrorist-as-felon policies of the Clinton era the first shooting occurred in Little Rock, Arkansas the state Clinton governed and was born in. And as Obama needs to return to the tougher counterterrorist policies of his predecessor to keep Americans safe the second attack occurred in Texas where George Bush lives and was governor for many years.

*June 1, 2009.


Did Bush's War on Terror seriously degrade al Qaida's ability to stage mass effect, multi-causualty simultaneous terrorist attacks like 9/11 as New Republic's Peter Beinart recently said in Time magazine (see)? I believe so. And this I believe is the principle reason for the gathering menace of homegrown terrorism. Impatient for action after eight years of waiting for another big al Qaida attack US jihadists have thrown down the gauntlet and decided to take matters into their own murderous hands and strike wherever and whenever they can. And strike they will as more jihadists defeat our weakened PC driven security system.

The argument recently made by counterterrorism expert and Beinart critic Malcolm Nance (see) that al Qaida is not in serious decline, and that there has been no plans for a second 9/11 because the first one achieved bin Ladin's objective of inciting the US to invade Afghanistan, is poppycock. Other mass attacks were planned and were foiled. Bin Ladin believed that three blows from his sword is all it would take to bring down America. And that the 9/11 attack, the third after East Africa and the USS Cole, would be the final and decisive blow.

Operation Enduring Freedom caught bin Ladin by surprise, it defied his image of America as a "paper tiger" impressed on him by the Clinton years. Bin Ladin believed that Bush's response to 9/11 would be no worse than Clinton's feeble firing of missiles into al Qaida facilities and training camps; or stepped up military support to the Northern Alliance in its war on al Qaida and the Taliban-which is why bin Ladin had its leader killed just days before 9/11. However, it wasn't America that would collapse after 9/11 but bin Ladin's base in Afghanistan and his global operations which the Bush administration decimated-now being a shadow of its former self. With the Taliban driven from power and al Qaida chased out of Afghanistan bin Ladin then revised his prediction of an imminent US collapse and claimed that the invasion was his plan all along to defeat America as he and the Mujahadeen defeated the Soviets (with American help).

The real danger now to homeland security is al Qaida in America, the enemy within, the homegrown jihadist; those anti-US Moslem Americans like Abdul Hakim Muhammed and Nidal Hasan* who are hell-bent on compensating for bin Ladin's lost ability to massively project terror by killing as many Americans as they can in smaller and less lethal strikes but "no less traumatizing than the big ones," as Nance rightly says.

Nidal was impressed with Abdul's attack.

NOTES:

The numeroiogical table used in this work:
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE PEOPLE OF HAITI AND THE USA (SLIGHTLY REVISED)



STEWART AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, N.Y. - New York City Urban Search and Rescue personnel aboard a 21st AS C-17 prepare for a flight to Haiti . NYC Task Force 1 team will conduct search and rescue operations in Haiti. (U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Michael O'Halloran) 

The question we should be asking ourselves is not why the good Lord let this natural catastrophe ravage and ruin poor Haiti? But what good could come out of this evil for its suffering, backward, dysfunctional people? If national sin was the reason for the earthquake, as Rev. Robertson says, then let's pray that Haitians find righteousness and a new way of life to renew and rebuild their land. America who is coming to Haiti's rescue like some great big brother or guardian angel should be the ideal that its people aspire to. People of Haiti look to America for what it is: the Mecca of Liberty and civilization. The shinning city on a hill to emulate. The model nation for your political and social salvation.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789102122Next »