Kaddafi defaced as Hitler. And why not? He has more in common with the Nazi leader than with the Islamonazi supremacists that venomously hate him as the unIslamic leader of an unIslamic secular regime who once boasted that he was greater than the Prophet Mohammed.
Muammar Kaddafi runs a brutal, oppressive pan-Arab national-secular-socialist regime which came to power in a military coup that fell on the 30th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of Poland*-a meaningful coincidence on account of Kaddafi having more in common with Hitler's race based National Socialism than with Islamic supremacists like Bin Laden and the Moslem Brothers-who curse him (like they did the secular socialist Saddam) as a hypocrite, corrupter and enemy of the faith. Indeed, because of the un-Islamic character of Kaddafi's regime Imam Saleh Al-Lehaydan, a leading member of the Saudi Council of Ulma (senior religious scholars), the Kingdom's top Islamic body, said of the Libyan leader that he's not an "Imam or true Moslem (see
)." Indeed, with an Islamic revival ominously sweeping over the Middle East and into Libya much of the rage aimed at Kaddafi is over his failed, outmoded, un-Islamic pan-Arab socialist revolution. With good reason a MidEast analyst in Egypt recently predicted that anti-Western, pro-Sharia Islamists (the best organized force in Libya) are likely to determine Libya's direction when Kaddafi's gone (see
). If Sarkozy and Obama heed the call of the rebels to help them in their cause and they prevail we mustn't expect any gratitude or good will from an Islamist state in the post-Kaddafi era. We're just the infidel tools of Allah in his plan to Islamize the world. The conflict in Libya is not between good and evil, but between evil men fighting for the triumph of their evil dreams of tyranny, oppression and civic death. If Allah favors the Islamists they don't need our help.
*Kaddafi came to power on September 1, 1969, the 30th anniversary of Hitler's invasion of Poland.