Posted by
ApolloSpeaks on Wednesday, December 21, 2011 7:49:42 AM
Desperate to shut down debate on his persistent and serial appeasing of enemies Obama deceitfully said, “Ask Osama bin Laden and the 22 out of 30 top al Qaeda leaders who have been taken off the field whether I engage in appeasement." If we asked the leaders of Russia, Iran, China, and the Moslem Brotherhood what would they say Mr. President?
Replying to accusations made by several GOP candidates of being soft with our enemies and damaging US security and strategic interests our Pretty-Please-Appeaser and Butt Kisser-in-Chief tried to defend himself from the charge and make his critics look foolish by pointing to the death of Osama bin Laden and other top Al Qaida leaders during his inept, misguided, and
blundering presidency. Okay, fine. Obama had enough good sense to continue his predecessors war on terror recognizing that there was no alternative in dealing with an enemy religiously hellbent on our destruction.
Now if Al Qaida were our only enemy (and only Islamic enemy) then Obama would be right, and GOP criticism would be groundless election year baloney to wrongly discredit his fitness as commander in chief. But our enemies are many, and outside Al Qaida Obama's appeasement mentality has shone like a torch making the earth a more dangerous place for America and freedom.
Indeed, to put Obama's self-defense in historical perspective and to show just how ludicrous and deceptive it is just take Neville Chamberlain's appeasement of Hitler, the model used by Gingrich, Romney, Bachmann and others when judging Obama's dangerous weakness with enemies. For using the death and capture of top Al Qaida leaders as proof of non-appeasement of enemies would be like Chamberlain brushing off Churchill's charge of appeasement with Hitler by pointing out that his government had been active in the killing and arresting of Irish Republican Army terrorists for their bombing campaign on British soil (this campaign started in 1939 eight months before Hitler's invasion of Poland see).
Being strong with implacable foes like Al Qaida who had killed 3000 Americans in a single day is one thing; being soft with implacable foes who aren't just yet killing Americans in order to avoid conflict and war is what Chamberlain did with Hitler at Munich, and what Obama is doing with Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, the OIC (see), the Moslem Brotherhood and their subversive domestic proxies like CAIR whose Islamic agenda is to destroy us from within while wrapped in the Constitution and American flag.
Also see
OBAMA'S APPEASEMENT OF MOSLEMS EARNS THEIR CONTEMPT, AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS
Postscript: Islamism, The Year's Big Winner
Look at what the Islamic Defender-Appeaser in Chief has brought us "Second Period of Islamic Power" Ironic isn't it that America's first president with Moslem family roots has been a blessing to the regressive forces of medieval Islamic darkness.
Who now will deny that 2011 has been Obama's 1979? Just as the big winner of 1979 (Jimmy Carter's third year) was the Ayatollah Khomeini and the Islamic revolution in Iran, so 2011 (Obama's third year) has been a boon for Islamic revolutionaries in Egypt and throughout the region.
Major websites linking this piece are as follows (click and see):