desert rat on PJ Media wrote :
As you know from what I wrote last month the unemployment rate dropping under 8% just 5 weeks before election day came as no surprise to me as I predicted this would likely happen and be Obama's October Surprise (see). And so it seems. I say "seems" because I can't prove that the administration and BLS conspired to get this result; or prove that BLS acting on its own intentionally manipulated the data to give Obama a pre-election gift. But either way there are signs suggesting that such a plot is underway and that BLS is in the tank for Obama as Jack Welch suspects (see). But before I get into this a word about Friday's report.
The 0.3% drop in the jobless rate (8.1% to 7.8%) from adding a pathetic, sickly 114,000 jobs to the economy, with a total of 418k RE-ENTERING the workforce*, doesn't add up. It's way too big of a drop for so few jobs and with so many people actively looking for work again. It would perhaps take twice as many workers (800,000) leaving the workforce to drive the rate down that low; yet strangely the report makes no mention of how many actually left. Why was that omitted? Jack Welch is correct: something stinks and stinks badly in Obamaland. Look at it this way:
Added 190K jobs in July, UE was 8.3% with 150k LEAVING the workforce.
Added 150K jobs in August, UE was 8.1% with 360k LEAVING the workforce.
Added 114K jobs in September, UE rate drops to 7.8% with 418k REENTERING the workforce* (no mention of how many left).
*The report states that 114,000 jobs were added to the economy last month and that the workforce grew by 418,000. Rational Liberal says that the 418k are new part time workers, and not unemployed people actively looking for work. Okay, assumimg that he's right why then has the U6 rate (for part timers) remained unchanged at 14.7% from August? Does that make any sense? Is this evidence that BLS is conspiring to keep U6 under 15%?
No one can make sense of these numbers except as a calculated plan to artifically bring the unemployment rate under 8% for the first time in 43 agonizing months. But there are numbers that suggest foul play; signs that point to a conspiracy from one of the most lawless and corrupt administrations in US history; that recently asked defense contractors like Lockheed to break the law and withhold the issuing of pink slips to tens and thousands of workers before the election-obviously because of its impact on the jobless rate especially in key battleground states like Virginia (see and see).
The conspiracy is to make Barack Hussein Obama the first president since FDR to win reelection despite a butt ugly economy. FDR did it in 1936 with unemployment at a staggering 17%; and Obama wants to achieve this feat with the worst recovery since the Great Depression: 23 million workers unemployed or underemployed, and a GDP at 1.3% that's grinding to a halt and headed toward a double dip recession. This is what the numbers say taking October 5th as the starting point when BLS issued its fishy, improbable, ridiculous report:
October 5th is 32 days from November 6th. 32 is the presidency number of FDR who was elected president in the 32nd year of the 20th century. Now when multiplied by 602 32 generates a five digit number encoded with the year 1936 when Roosevelt became the first US president reelected during great economic distress, hence:
Moreover, October 5th was the 1354th day of the Obama presidency which like 32 is a factor of a number encoded with the year 1936, hence:
1354x143 = 193622
Then there's the sign of brave Jack Welch whose been ridiculed to no end for questioning the adminstration's veracity on the jobs report. For Welch himself was born during the Great Depression less than a year before FDR's reelection in 1936*.
*Mr. Welch was born November 19, 1935 350 days before the election.
But the administration (or pro-Obama forces inside BLS) miscalculated. For October 5th was an inauspicious day for BLS to issue its report portending an unhappy outcome for Obama:
1) The 7.8% rate is a multiple of the number 13 0.6x*.
2) 1354 is a number in the 1300 series that's a variant of the number 13, 1+3+5+4=13.
3) On October 5th when Jack Welch sent out the Twitter blasting the administration for the 7.8% rate he was in the 28,080th day of his long and fruitful life. This large number is a multiple of 13 2160x. What this means is that Welch has either started something that could blow up in Obama's face; or that his criticism has already done great damage to a president losing credibility with the public on all fronts foreign and domestic-especially after Wednesday night's devastating debate.
THE SIGN OF 114,000
The number 114,000 (indicating the number of new workers added to the economy last month) is a multiple of 114 1000x. 114 is a numeric sign of Obama's election date of November 4th in 2008. Is this a clue or kind of Freudian Slip (a window into the truth) that BLS is attempting to help Obama in repeating his historic victory of 11-4-2008? I believe so.
When Chris Wallace asked Brit Hume Sunday if Friday's jobs report would help Obama's reelection campaign Hume answered in the negative: "It's what people see and feel that counts," said Hume-meaning that most Americans don't see or feel a recovery taking place-which is why they give Obama low grades on the economy. The same thing happened to George H. W. Bush in 1992. The story is as follows:
There was a recession in the early 1990s that was over by March 1991. At the time unemployment was about 8.1%, with GDP growth under 2% just like today. By November 1992 just before Election Day (several weeks after the Obamas were married) unemployment was at 7.4% and GDP was just under 3% (this was the beginning of the hi- tech driven internet .com economic boom that benefited Bill Clinton). With lower unemployment than Obama and higher GDP growth Bush couldn't keep his job; nor with 7.8% unemployment and less than half of Bush's GDP will Barack Obama keep his. BLS can message and manipulate the unemployment data all they want (if that's what they're doing); but with the surging deficit and national debt and GDP collapsing, and with most Americans (as in 1992) unable to see or feel a recovery, they can't calm fears with phony statistics and optimistic rhetoric that the nation is on the wrong track heading toward a double dip recession, which I predicted here.
An article showing Mitt Romney how to turn the BLS 7.8% report to his overwhelming advantage in the Hofstra debate.