Posted by
ApolloSpeaks on Saturday, October 13, 2012 11:59:01 AM
I received several emails from our leftist friends: Rational Liberal, Sam and OUTFOX'ed mocking me for my failed prediction (partially failed that is) about the Ryan-Biden debate being a blowout for Ryan. "Not only was there no Ryan blowout," OUT FOX'ed said, "but Biden was the winner and cleaned Ryan's clock." "Biden stopped the bleeding" said Rational Lib; "and now Obama will take back what he lost to Romney and take the election in November." Well most Conservatives and Republicans disagree. Though from start to finish Biden put Ryan on the defensive smirking, bullying and lying his way through the debate, the public in two out of three snap polls gave the younger, stalwart, unflinching Ryan the win because he was the honest, truthful adult in the room.
However, when I predicted that the "devastation would continue" believing Ryan would run circles around Biden (which he could have but didn't) I never dreamed that Biden would, as Di-ck Morris says "destroy himself" with his pathetic display school yard antics.
But assuming for arguments sake that Rat Lib and OUT FOX'ed are right: that Thursday was Joe Biden's night and that he took Ryan to the cleaners. What then? Could it mean, as Rat Lib assumes and hopes, that Biden stopped the Romney surge and he and Obama will be victors on November 6th? Not on your life! Just follow my unconventional reasoning and you'll see why this isn't fated to happen.
Midway through the Danville debate Joe Biden gave us a sign indicating his campaign is going down in defeat. It came when Biden challenging the mathematics of Romney's tax plan dared Ryan to give him an example where it worked. Ryan shot back with Jack Kennedy who slashed tax rates on all Americans and high income earners by 20%, just as Romney/Ryan propose. This Supply Side tax cut averted a recession and sent the economy soaring while increasing federal revenues. The mathematics worked for Kennedy but Biden in denial would have none of it. Sensing he could have a Lloyd Bentsen moment in the debate (Bensten ridiculed Dan Quayle in the 1988 VP debate for believing he was another JFK) Biden sneered "So now you think you're another Jack Kennedy?" Bentsen bested Quayle and won the debate; but he and Mike Dukakis lost the election to Bush and Quayle (winning only 10 states). And the same fate, I believe, is ahead for Obama and Biden in November with Ryan sworn in as the 48th Vice President at the inaugural-Biden won't be smirking then.
Indeed, the Bentsen/Quayle debate was held in Omaha, Nebraska on October 5, 1988 (see). Dan Quayle, born February 4, 1947 was just 36 days old when Mitt Romney was born. At the time of the debate Quayle was 41 years young, one year younger than Paul Ryan is today.
Now in my piece Ryan Will Replace Biden, Part II (see) I noted that 8 days separated the Ryan-Biden from the Romney-Obama debates. I also noted that the first significant multiple of 8 that's meaningfully related to the 2012 campaign was the number 48 (8x6) denoting the vice presidency number Paul Ryan is contending for. Now this is where it gets profound and points to a Romney win with Ryan becoming 48th VP. Exactly 24 years and 6 days separate the Bentsen-Quayle from the Ryan-Biden debates: 48 is a multiple of 24 2x. Moreover, 24 years and six days = 8772 days. The digits of this number add up to 24, or half 48, hence:
8+7+7+2 = 24.
But stronger and more compelling signs that Ryan will be replacing Biden are based on the number of days separating his debate with Biden and January 20th when he'll be sworn in 48th VP. Now from the debate on October 11th to Inauguration Day is 101 days. Now when I Iook at the multiples of 101 I notice that the first number that has significance for the VP race is 4747. (101x47 = 4747). This indicates Joe Biden's vice presidency number 47 twice. This would seem to confound my prognostications by indicating a second inaugural for Obama and Biden. But look at this: if 101 is multiplied by 48 it generates the equally meaningful number 4848 suggesting a Romney-Ryan inaugural with Ryna sworn in as VP. Is this a contradiction? Or does it indicate that 4747 being first in order is a sign that Obama-Biden will prevail? I don't believe so, and say this for the following reasons:
144 and 147
In part two of this series I noted that the number 144, as related to the presidential race, is symbolic of our 44th President having only 1 term. Similarly the number 147 could symbolize our 47th VP having a single term. Now watch this: 101x147 = 14847; with the October 11th debate 101 days from Inauguration Day multiplying 101 by 147 (indicative of Biden being a one term VP) generates a five digit number containing the significant numbers 48 and 47 in an order indicating Paul Ryan (48) replacing Joe Biden (47) as VP. Reinforcing this is the over all numerical value of the number 14847, hence:
1+4+8+4+7 = 24x2 = 48.
Whether Biden won the debate, as those on the left believe, or Ryan won, as we believe, won't change what, I believe, is the predestined Republican election outcome made possible by an electorate swayed by political and providential events.
Postscript
Based on the number 101 what I did for the vice presidential candidates I can do for Obama (44) and Romney (45). Indeed, when multiplied by 44 101 generates the number 4444 giving us 44 twice. Similarly, multiplied by 45 101 generates 4545 giving us 45 twice. Now when we multiply 101 by 144 (indicative of a single term for Obama) it produces the highly meaningful number 14544 indicating that Mitt Romney will be the one sworn into office on January 20, 2013.
Major websites linking this piece are as follows: