About Me

Name: ApolloSpeaks
Email: reninvest2007@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

IT'S THE ECONOMY (NOT OBAMA) STUPID?



Obamanomics sinking our titanic economy


"IT'S THE ECONOMY (NOT OBAMA) STUPID" read this morning's headlines at Huffington Post. But the lefties at HuffPo are in denial; it's a very confused and stupid president and his regressive economic policies* that led to yesterday's Republican victories in Virginia and New Jersey; and to a not too shabby showing for Conservative candidate Doug Hoffman in New York's District 23.

*Obamanomics turns the laws of economic reality on its head. It's the ideological triumph of spending and spreading wealth over its creation.

After yesterday's debacle what honest Progressive will dare say that Obama is the new FDR with a transformational destiny? Who on the Left would be so dumb? So blindly audacious and delusional?

On the first off year election during FDR's presidency (1934) Democrats took nine Republican seats in Congress, including an open seat in Maryland and the seats of eight incumbants. And in the only gubenatorial race of that year FDR backed the Republican incumbant against Socialist candidate Upton Sinclair in a landslide victory in California.

Obama is no FDR. An inspirational leader he is not. Unlike Roosevelt he can't inspire national optimism or raise and sustain public morale in the midst of uncertainty and economic gloom.

Tuesday's election was a stunning defeat for Obama's economic leadership and an administration without a clue on how to end the recession. Face reality Progressives! Obama is the Great Depressor, the Democratic Herbert Hoover turning a recession into a depression with Summers, Geithner and the dope who heads the Fed driving the economy over the edge (see).

Postscript: Black Monday 777

This triplet number was made famous on Monday September 29th of last year when two weeks after Lehman's filed for bankruptcy the market crashed and lost 777 points with a trillion plus of investor's wealth wiped out. I mention this because when we divide this triplet number by 3 it gives us the number 259, the exact number of days seperating Obama's "historic" signing of the economic recovery plan (ARRA) and yesterday's anti-Obamanomics election, hence:

February 17 (the signing of ARRA) to November 3=259 days.

259x3=777.

This I believe is an ominous sign that another percipitous market decline is near due to the destructive effects of Obamanomics and the monetary policies of the FED (see).
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE OBAMA EFFECT, ISLAM AND THE GATHERING STORM

 

Obama in Egypt standing before the montrous Sphinx (symbol of the Middle East) before it devours him.
 
At the start of the Obama presidency it was said that the long dark night of the Bush years were over and that dawning was a brave new age in international relations; an age of sweetness and light; an era of moral and global transformation with Obama resolving foreign conflicts and bringing peace to the world through diplomacy, multilateralism and the moral force of his character. This was called the Obama Effect the impact of Obama's charismatic genius and mesmerizing charms in altering the "disastrous" course of US foreign policy, winning over enemies and alienated peoples and healing a broken world.

But predictably the Obama Effect has been something very different and very disturbing especially on the world of Islam*.

*Reconciliation with Islam is central to Obama’s foreign policy.

America is a war weary nation in economic crisis tired of its missions in Iraq and Afghanistan; tired of terrorist threats to the homeland; tired of its conflict with Islam. Millions of Americans voted for Obama believing that we were the cause of this conflict; that we were at fault for 9/11 and that resolution could come peacefully through engagement, diplomacy and the appeasement of grievances; come through a gifted black man with Moslem roots and an Arabic middle name; the right man at the right time in world history for ending the clash between America and Islam and averting new wars and catastrophes. But appeasement has been on steroids and the enemy remains undaunted.

After bowing to the Saudi king, his apology tour through Europe and Turkey and his Moslem outreach speech in Egypt-flattering the faith for real and imagined achievements-Obama has failed; Moslem family roots and all, Arabic name and all, skin color and all he has failed to win the hearts and minds of a hostile Moslem world; failed to stop the clash of civilizations-the war of principles, values and ideals-and reconcile Islam and America.

Ten months in office and what has Obama achieved? Turkey has taken the radical path and joined the Islamist camp-a blow to the NATO Alliance (see); Iran continues its nuclear program, funding of terror and threats to Israel and the Middle East, while emboldened jihadists in Afghanistan, Hamastan, Lebanon and the homeland* grow in confidence that victory is at hand.

*Since Obama took office 46 jihadi terrorists have been arrested in our country; an unprecedented number in so short a time. An ominous sign.

Indeed, Islam views Obama as a weak, ineffective and reckless president unfit to command crashing our economy and foreign policy and achieving by his leadership, or lack thereof, what Osama bin Ladin failed to do on 9/11.

Islamists see Obama as a godsend; a providential gift and blessing from Allah; a divine sign that America is finished as a superpower; that the Pax Americana is over, soon to be replaced by the Pax Islamica (Islamic World Peace) with Islam returning to history as a great political and military power; returning to complete its prophetic destiny-as foretold by Mohammed-of universal supremacy and religious world rule.

Obama's ideology and Moslem outreach policy is feeding the triumphalism of our Islamonazi enemies while demoralizing our allies and democratic friends; his timidity, ignorance and ill conceived plans are intensifying the clash between Islam and the West and making the world a more dangerous place for believers and infidels. This is the real Obama Effect. The perfect storm is gathering strength. There is nothing but chaos and peril ahead. God help us all.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BARACK OBAMA'S AFGHANISTAN: A WAR OF NECESSITY NO MORE


Boy Obama's favorite punching bag to relieve his frustrations and fears.

For Obama the Afghan War that was "a war of necessity that we have to win" has now turned into an awful morass inherited from Bush and Cheney that he now sees as unwinnable. It's not so much, as Krauthammer says, that Obama is playing the blame game with Bush because his strategy in Afghanistan has failed (see ); it's because he now realizes that no strategy can succeed in defeating the Taliban and building a modern democratic state without support of a mostly docile, passive, hostile, unwilling, illiterate Afghan people*.

*When we invaded Afghanistan in 2001 our troops were greeted as liberators by the oppressed Afghan people. Now they are seen as occupiers who have overstayed their welcome.

Obama's recent whining about Bush reveals a change of mind about the necessity of the Afghan War. In other words, after ten months of failing to get bin Ladin, and charm the Afghan people into venerating him, Obama is stuck with a war that he wants to disown; a war he no longer wants to fight and that's impossible for him to quit. If he declares victory and leaves Afghanistan-because Al Qaida, as Jim Jones says, is a fragment of its former self-and we're hit again in a deadly terror attack, Obama is finished. If he continues the war with a surge of troops and the Taliban remains unbeaten with mounting US deaths and casualties Obama then becomes a new LBJ with a new Vietnam and an anti-war revolt on the Left reminescent of the 60s*.

*If Obama doesn't end the Afghan War by 2012 George Soros and the ultra-liberal left will most likely support a Democratic challenger who will.

Krauthammer uses the Iraq model for Afghanistan while forgetting two things: Iran's policy change in 2007 to rein in Al Sadr and scale down the Shiite insurgency*; and the Anbar Awakening which decimated Al Qaida in Iraq with US help. There is nothing comparable happening in Afghanistan. The Taliban-supported by Iran and possibily Russia-are implacably bent unto death on our defeat and retreat. A heavier footprint and surge of troops cannot by itself replicate in Afghanistan our success in Iraq. Afghanistan is a quagmire, a nation-buliding nightmare, and Obama knows it. He curses Bush for leaving him an unwinnable war that is likely to ruin his presidency and domestic agenda. Obama is fortune's hapless fool headed for failure and a legacy of ashes. After lying his way to the presidency wearing a messianic mask the law of karmic retribution is falling on his head and the insidious plans of the anti-war Left.

*Once the fear of a US invasion passed a stable and functioning Iraq was seen by Tehran as the best option for expediting the withdrawal of US ground forces from the region. As Ahmadenijad said in August of that year: "Once US forces leave the region we and our friends (the Syrians) will fill the vacuum."


  
The mess FDR left Truman never got the better of his adult soul.  

Postscript: Harry Truman: The Adult Wartime President

Victor Davis Hanson recently wrote a short insightful piece for the Wall Street Journal comparing Barack Obama to that other Democratic president who inherited a war from his predecessor, Harry Truman (see). Hanson reminds us that Truman was left with a mess horrifically worse than the Afghan War-which included giving away Eastern Europe to Stalin. Though Truman did his share of complaining never once was he heard blaming FDR for his problems. If Truman were alive today he'd have nothing but contempt for Obama's constant whining and weakness in dealing with enemies. America has the right president at the right time in history when adulthood is practically dead in our culture and perpetual adolescence is the ideal (see  and see ).




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AFGHANISTAN AND THE ANBAR AWAKENING

 

Abdul Satter Abu Rishawi: father, hero and martyr 
of the Anbar Awakening.Has no equivalent in Afghanistan.
 
The tragic crash of three US helicopters in Afghanistan on Monday was emblematic of our military fortunes in that country. It was an unmistakable sign warning that our strategic dilemma there is irreversible and hopeless, that the war there is a lost cause, and that the best course to take is withdrawal. This is not due to a lack of will and resolve by US forces to defeat al-Qaida and the Taliban; our men and women are patriots and motivated to win and could do so with their present numbers if the situation on the ground warrented; if it was favorable like it was in Iraq with the Anbar Awakening. But there is nothing remotely comparable to the Anbar miracle in Afghanistan. There is no visionary Afghan tribal leader like the fearless and charismatic Sheik Abdul Al-Rishawi to unite the divided Afghan tribes against the Taliban, as martyred Rishawi united the Sunnis in a victorious jihad against al-Qaida with US help.

After eight years of war with al-Qaida and the Taliban, after  blowing up, torturing and brutally murdering thousands of innocent men, women and children, the Afghans are not outraged or hell bent on revenge as were the Anbar Sunnis who chose war and death to al Qaida rule. Kill them as you may the Afghans lack the will, resolve and national spirit to support the Kabul government and confront and defeat the Taliban.
The war is hopeless because the Afghans are hopelessly divided, passive and docile. While they fear the Taliban returning to power they're unwilling to risk life and limb to prevent it. The spirit of freedom burns dimly in Afghanistan and try as we may it can't be fanned into a consuming national flame. That is the sad reality and why we must retreat and leave Afghanistan to its miserable fate. We must leave trusting in God and Providence that in the long run of history it will serve the cause of liberty; we must trust that Afghanistan will not be our graveyard as it was for other great powers; we must trust that God will set things right; that He will bring good out of the catastrophe of Afghanistan; that out of its ashes will soar the eagle of victory over our murdering Moslem foes, just as our debacle in Vietnam led to the rise of Ronald Reagan and the fall of the Soviet State (see).
 
Postscript
 
Because the Afghan War is unwinnable it will be a political disaster for Barack Obama. He is damned if he does and if he doesn't. Whether he pulls out our troops or leaves them in to fight; whether he goes McChrystal heavy or lite in the end the war will be one of many factors that will ruin his presidency and destroy the ultra liberal progressive Left-with Reagan Conservatives returning to power to make everything RIGHT.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA'S WORST DAY IN AFGHANISTAN AND ITS MEANING


    
       Vietnam              Afghanistan

On the day Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was celebrating her 62nd birthday and Barack Obama met with his national security team in a conference on Afghanistan tragedy struck US forces in that country as two seperate accidents involving three helicopters-one crashing to the ground and two colliding in mid air-claimed the lives of 14 Americans. This was the single most deadliest day in Afghanistan since Obama took office; and as enemy fire wasn't the cause of either crash it may be ominous of terrible disasters to come for our troops due to Obama's inept, dithering and demoralizing leadership and the strategy he chooses in fighting the war.

Consider this:

NBC Mideast correspondent Richard Engel was supposed to be the 11th person aboard one of the crashed helicopters (see). When asked by Charlie Rose in a recent interview if we "should get out of Afghanistan" Engels answered in the affirmative (see).


Engel was born in 1973* seven months after the signing of the Paris Peace accords that ended the Vietnam War. Our training and arming of the South Vietnamese, Vietnamization, proved futile as they were easily overrun by the Communist North once we deserted them. Is Engel a sign that building up the Afghan military and security forces is a waste of time and that once we leave Afghanistan they will be easily defeated by the Taliban?

*September 16, 1973

Hillary Clinton was born on the day Great Britain withdrew its military forces from Iraq* ending a six year occupation. This is the same Great Britain that pulled its troops from Afghanistan in defeat in the mid-19th century.

*October 26, 1947

Yesterday was the 42nd anniversary of John McCain's tragic flight over North Vietnam* when his plane was shot down during a bombing run. McCain, a leading proponent of McChrystal's counterinsurgency plan, was captured by the enemy during the Johnson administration and spent five and a half horrific years in a Communist jail. This links Afghanistan with Vietnam.

*McCain's plane was shot down October 26, 1967.

Yesterday would have been the 87th birthday of Madelyn Dunham*, Barack Obama's grandmother who died of cancer one day before his election victory last year-an unmistakable sign of her grandson's tragic destiny now tied into yesterday's disaster in Afghanistan (see).

*Dunham was born October 26, 1922. The number 87 gives us the date 8-7 or August 7th. On this date in 1965 Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution authorizing LBJ to use militray force in Vietnam to prevent attacks against US forces.

14 Americans died yesterday ten soldiers and four civilians. When we multiply this number by 139 it gives us the number 1946. This signifies the year when the First Indochina War began between the Imperial French and Ho Cho Minh's Red Army. Ho's defeat of the French in 1954 is what drew us militarily into Vietnam.

1946 was also the year George Bush was born the President who sent us into Afghanistan in pursuit of al Qaida. It was also the year that John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon won their first Congressional races; this kicked off their political careers culminating in the presidency. It was Kennedy who first ordered US military intervention in Vietnam* (four months after Obama was born) and Nixon who ended it.

*December 11, 1961 (see note 1).

Obama and Nixon are the only presidents in US history to inherit wars from presidents of the opposite party-both Texans. (This correction was made on 10-29).

Yesterday was Obama's 179th day in office. 179 is a factor of the number 1969 (11x) giving us the year Richard Nixon became our 37th president. This marked the beginning of the end for the Vietnam War and coming defeat and humiliation for America. Will Obama end up throwing in the towel and negotiate peace with the Taliban to end the war?

It is reported that Obama's greatest fear is Afghanistan hijacking his presidency and overshadowing his domestic agenda as happened to the hapless LBJ (see).
Obama is right to fear ending up like LBJ with Afghanistan turning into his Vietnam as he delivered his acceptance speech at the Democratic Convention one day after the centennial of LBJ's birth*.

*August 27,2008 was the 100th anniversary of LBJ's birth.

Obama has tragedy, misfortune, failure and defeat written all over him. This is his destiny and it is inescapable. Yesterday's terrible military accident is a sign that whatever decision Obama makes on Afghanistan will have a bad outcome for our troops, national security and his presidency.

Did Providence intervene in saving Richard Engel's life because his view on leaving Afghanistan is the best of many bad options? Did the helicopter crashes fall on Hillary Clinton's birthday as a sign that it would be best that we retreat from Afghanistan like the Brits did from Iraq 62 years ago?

Be that as it may, Obama quitting Afghanistan is not in the cards for the moment. Obama is the Bush derangement president (see ) obsessed with besting Bush and Cheney in the War on Terror and capturing or killing Osama bin Ladin. Afghanistan, so it seems, is destined to be Obama's Vietnam (see). His fear of ending up a failed, ineffective one term president like LBJ is being realized.

Postscript: Is Karzai Afghanistan's Diem?



 
Karzai                                   Diem

Analogies between Hamid Karzai and murdered South Vietnam President Ngo Diem are by now a dime a dozen. But it is interesting to note that Diem started his presidency on October 26, 1955. Were the fatal copter crashes of October 26th ominous for Karzai as it appearently was for the US war effort in Afghanistan?

 
NOTES:

1. On December 11, 1961 the U.S. aircraft carrier "Core" arrived in Saigon with 33 helicopters and 400 air and ground crewmen assigned to operate them for the South Vietnamese Army. Also, U.S. pilots started to train and fly support missions with the South Vietnamese Air Force. This really marks the first larger scale participation of U.S. military "advisors" in Vietnam.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (10) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ATTACKING FOX WON'T SAVE OBAMA (REVISED)


Midgetman smiling and lying his merry way to the
Presidents' Hall of Shame


The administration is collapsing at home and failing abroad from the tragic flaws and deficiencies of its leader, not from tea party protests, town hall meetings, Republican obstructionists and fearful Americans opposed to his reckless policies. Obama is unfit to command and lacks the right stuff to succeed as president; and calculated distractions like attacking FOX News, Rush Limbaugh and the Chamber of Commerce won't save him from catastrophe.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OMENS OF OBAMA'S ECONOMIC WATERLOO: BOOMING DOW MEANS BUST FOR OBAMA




Rod Blagojevich and Roland Burris. Omens of Obama's economic Waterloo

1936, six years into the Great Depression, the US economy was in a jobless recovery*. All the main economic indicators, including the DOW, had more or less regained the levels of the late 1920s before the Great Crash-except for unemployment which remained high at 16%. Then came the crash of 1937 when the DOW came tumbling down and the bottom fell out of the New Deal with two million Americans losing their jobs**.

*Millions of unemployed Americans were given make work (not real work) jobs on public projects by the Works Projects Administration (WPA).
 
**Real jobs in the private sector.

History is about to repeat itself. The 10,000 bull market is as phony and false as Obama's economic recovery plan-a huge slush fund to pay off and reelect political allies that has done squat to create jobs and restore growth to the economy. Like the housing market boom (which Bernanke predicted would never crash) the stock market surge is an unsustainable bubble certain to bust-driven by overpriced stocks especially in the financial sector where zombie banks are speculating with TARP money and cooking their books by hiding hundreds and billions in losses with the blessing of Bernanke, Geithner, Dodd and the Feds.

This fraud is being done by new rules that allow banks to value their toxic assets (mortgage backed securities, etc) not at their real worth but on their projected future hoped for value at maturity. So if Chase, for example, has a mortgage backed security presently worth zero that could have value in the future Chase's balance sheet reflects that future value-not its actual worth. It's a suckers game of smoke and mirrors (similar to the Enron scam) designed to mislead the public and investors by making the banks look healthier than they are (see). And this is what's leading Obama's certain-to-bust phony bull market.

But returning to 1937, the year FDR met his economic Waterloo, this was the year that Roland Burris was born*-the man Rod Blagojevich chose to replace Barack Obama in the Senate. An ominous sign of Obama's presidential fate and bad times ahead for the economy (see).

*Burris was born on August 3rd one day before Obama celebrates his birthday.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PRO-ISLAMIST TURKEY: BARACK OBAMA'S NEW IRAN




Prime Minister Erdogan and Syrian strongman Assad putting their differences behind them at historic meeting in Damascus

What we are witnessing under the clueless, incompetent, misguided presidency of Barack Hussein Obama is not just the willful weakening of US prosperity, power and prestige for ideological reasons but the radical Carterization of American foreign policy setting the stage for global conflict, upheaval and war. Indeed, Turkey's recent betrayal of America and the West (see) by joining the Axis of Jihadist States-Iran, Syria, Hezbollah, Hamas-is reminsecent of Jimmy Carter losing Iran's pro-Western government of the Shah to the America hating radical mullahs.

Ironically, and as a sign of losing Turkey to radical Islam, Obama's visit to Ankara last April fell on the 91st anniversary of Woodrow Wilson's declaration of war on Imperial Germany and the Central powers-which included the Ottoman Turks (see below). Incredibiliy, hours after Obama delivered his fawning speech from Ankara a young Canadian Turk stole a single engine plane from a Canadian flight training school and flew it across the US border landing it unintentionally in CARTER County, Missouri (see).

Not by chance was Obama elected President on the 29th anniversary of Carter's Iran Hostage Crisis. Not by chance did Obama start nuclear negotiations with Iran on October 1st of this year, Jimmy Carter's 85th birthday (see)*.

*October 19th, the first actual day of Iran nuke talks, was one year to the date of Joe Biden's warning that Obama would be tested with a major foreign policy crisis (see).

Just as Carter's feeble and feckless presidency, which gave us a 444 day hostage crisis (with one failed rescue mission), convinced Ayatollah Khomenie that America was a helpless giant that "can't do a damn thing;" so too has the pathetic Carter-like appeaser in the White House, and his obsequious, contemptible pandering to the Islamic world, convinced Turkey's Islamist Prime Minister that America, Israel and the West are on the losing side of history; and that the future belongs to the deadly forces of Islamic terror and tyranny.

With the loss of Turkey to the enemy camp America continues to lose the "zero sum game" of international power politics which our dumb a$$ president refuses to play, treating it as contemptibly beneath his wisdom and dignity*. There will be hell to pay for this childish stupidity as the emboldening of our enemies continues apace and the world becomes a more dangerous place.

*The game of power politics is fueled by national self-interest political and economic. Obama in his naivety is trying to change the nature and rules of the game by abandoning national self-interest-what is good for America-for a greater encompassing global good: universal equality where all nations are equal in wealth and power and living at peace free from the deadly threat of Global Warming. He is vainly trying to humanize a predatory world and lead it by example into this wonderful new age. But Obama's example is taken for weakness by vicious enemies who are intent on our destruction and want to replace us at the pinnacle of world power. Instead of a new world of justice and peace Obama is blindly taking us in the opposite direction and leading the world into greater conflict, aggression, bloodshed and war (see ).



Postscript

Early German victories in World War I convinced Turkey to join the Central Powers believing it was the winning horse in the war. Similarly, Obama's diplomatic blunders, defeats and gutlessness have convinced Turkey to decisively break with the Western World and join the anti-American Islamist cause. Turkey is now our Islamist enemy thanks to Barack Obama.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US CONDEMNS KILLING OF IRANIAN MURDERERS


 
Hitler's conference room at Rastenburg soon after assassination attempt with briefcase bomb

The United States on Sunday condemned a suicide bombing that struck Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards killing five top commanders. In response to Iran accusing America of the plot State Department Spokesman Ian Kelly said, "We condemn this act of terrorism and mourn the loss of innocent lives. Reports of US involvement are completely false," Kelly assured the terrorist regime in Tehran (read more).

To understand just how insane this is imagine the Roosevelt Administration during World War II condemning Colonel van Stauffenberg (played by Tom Cruise in the film Valkyrie) and the German officers who came close to blowing Hitler to bits with a briefcase bomb in his headquarters at Rastenburg.

These murdered "innocent" Revolutionary Guard leaders are cold blooded Islamonazi killers who may very well have the blood of US servicemen on their hands going back to the Beirut barracks bombing in 1982, the Khobar Towers' bombing 14 years later and the more recent killing of US soldiers on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.

When issuing the statement the Obama Administration just plum forgot about the Kyle-Lieberman Bill passed by the Senate in September 2007 listing the Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Then again maybe it didn't forget as then Senator Obama opposed the bill calling it "provocative."

Postscrpt: 10-20-09

After the State Department's condemnation of Sunday's terrorist attack in Southeastern Iran that killed six Iranian Revolutionary Gurad commanders the Revolutionary Guard swore revenge on Britain and the US for funding, training and arming Jundollah, the anti-mullah Sunni group that planned and executed the atttack. Differing from the Revolutionary Guard Kayhan, the influential pro-government newspaper, accused Israel's Mossad of being behind the attack.

Jundollah says it is fighting the mulllahs to end discrimination against Iran's 6 million Sunni Moslems. Both Britain and the US deny any connection with the group. Israel, to my knowledge, has denied nothing. Pakistani intelligence claims that Jundollah receives support from the Taliban; and that arms supplied to the Taliban by Iran have found their way to Jundollah.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA RIGHTLY NIXES BERLIN WALL EVENT


 
Ronald Reagan speaking in front of the Brandenburg Gate at the Berlin Wall

Obama's decision not to attend November 9th festivities in Berlin for the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall was the right one made for the wrong reasons (see). As Obama gave his November 11th trip to China as his excuse for not going truth is he's not worthy enough and presidential enough to attend this occassion. Would it be proper for an anti-Reagan leftist who believes in peace through weakness and appeasement to represent our county at the celebration of a great world event made possible by the opposite policies? It was unremitting confrontation and "peace through strength" that brought down the Wall, reunified Germany and freed Eastern Europe from Sovist rule. There's no place for Obama at this event as his presence would be an embarrassment. Indeed, if Obama was President in the 1980s the world would be living a different history today. For Gorbachev would have seduced Obama at Reykjavik with offers to cut strategic nuclear arms and the Berlin Wall would still be standing with Poland, Hungry and Eastern Europe divided from the West under Soviet rule.

As it was Reagan's heroic virtues, confrontational policies, militray buildup and walk out at Reykjavik which changed the course of history and liberated millions from tyranny the Berlin Wall festivities is no place for the cowardly, weak, groveling Obama whose incompetent bungling leadership is benefiting Russian imperialism and hurting the cause of freedom around the world.
 
 
Postscript I: Flagless in Berlin
 
In July of last year when Obama was in Berlin addressing a crowd of 200,000-without sharing the stage with a US flag (see)-he was celebrating himself as a great enlightened transnational "world citizen" who as president would transcend the petty Cold War concerns of a Ronald Reagan, of knocking down a single wall dividing a city, and work to knock down all walls and barriers separating nations and peoples.
 
Could this be the reason for Obama missing the Berlin Wall festivities? While he certainly doesn't belong there does he nevertheless see it as something beneath him? Something falling far short of his lofty, post-nation state, new age ideals of an undivided world united in peace? Perhaps in part. But the main reason, I believe, for the canceling of his plans is as follows:
 
 
Postscript II: Why did Obama Cancel his Trip to Berlin?

Most likely to avoid the humiliation of having his failed foreign policy compared to Ronald Reagan's victorious record and courageous world view. All week long Hannity, Rush, Levin and Beck, and every right wing columnist and blogger on the internet, would be measuring Obama the man, his diplomatic disasters and unearned Nobel Prize against Ronald Reagan's epic achievement of ending the East-West conflict and bringing down the Soviet state-which Obama unhistorically denies giving equal credit to Western Europe and other presidents*. Getting blasted for not going to Berlin is the lesser of two evils as our weak, groveling fool of a president lives in fear of Reagan and his legacy of PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH.
 
*After Reagan walked out of the Reykjavik Summit Gorbachev said that it forced him to realize "that a new world was possible."  It was this same Gorbachev who said that Reagan's military buildup (opposed by Obama) was a decisive factor "in spending the Soviet Union into bankrutcy." In an interview on the History Channel in 2002  Gorbachev again credited Reagan with ending the Cold War by saying: "Without Ronald Reagan I do not know what would have happned." Even the anti-Reagan Ted Kennedy was man enough to admit that "Ronald Reagan won the Cold War."
 
 
Postscript III: What if Obama was President in 1941, 1961 or 1981, etc.?



Replace FDR with Barack Obama and there would not have been a Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb; and following the catastrophe of World War II there would have been an equally terrible and devastating war with the Soviet Union and its Communist allies.

Replace Harry Truman with Barack Obama and Hiroshima and Nagasaki would not have been nuked; and America would have been forced to invade Japan adding one million bodies to 60 million dead-including the slaughter of 300,000 POWs held in Japanese prison camps*.

*The Japanese threatened to kill all POWS if their country was invaded. By itself this would have exceeded the death toll of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings.

Replace JFK with Barack Obama and Communism would have totally engulfed Indochina with millions more dying from starvation, disease and war than were killed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War*. And US cities would be under the threat of nuclear attack from Communist Cuba.

*North Vietnam lost one million soldiers in its war with the US. A grealty weakned North Vietnamese army saved Indochina from Ho Chi Minh's regional ambitions.

 
Replace Ronald Reagan with Barack Obama and Gorbachev, as I said above, would have triumphed at Reykjavik; and the Evil Empire would still be standing more threatening and menacing than ever.
Replace George H. W. Bush with Barack Obama and Saddam Hussein would have annexed Kuwait, developed nuclear weapons* then invaded and annexed Saudi Arabia threatening its oil fields with nuclear destruction if anyone dared to stop him.
 
*After the Gulf War US weapons inspector David Kay uncovered a clandestine nuclear weapons program in Iraq.
 
As Obama's reckless doctrine of apology, appeasement and abasement turns into the worst diplomatic fiasco since Chamberlain at Munich we can only guess at the horrors of death and destruction he is unleashing upon the world.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE RECONCILIATION OF AMERICA AND ISLAM: BARACK OBAMA’S SECRET PLAN FOR HEALING US/MOSLEM RELATIONS

 
http://www.marktalk.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/obama-terrorist-2.jpg 
 
It is not I believe mere coincidence that Keith Ellison, the first and only Moslem to sit in the US Congress, the man who took his Congressional oath on the Koran and supports pro-jihadist hate groups such as MAS and CAIR*, shares the same birthday with Barack Hussein Obama**. For Obama, the first US president with Moslem family roots, is the “Defender of Islam in Chief” as he swore to the Islamic world (in his Moslem outreach speech) to fight “negative stereotyping” of the faith and anti-Moslem bigotry.

*See Robert Spencer’s outstanding book Stealth Jihad for an exhaustive account of pro-jihadist organizations like the Moslem American Society (MAS) and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) devoted to the salvation of America from the evils of Christianity, secularism and individual freedom.

**Obama and Ellison were born on August 4th two years apart in 1961 and 1963.

But Obama’s connection with Ellison is emblematic of something deeper than fighting domestic injustices against Moslem Americans, which is not now and never was a serious problem. Indeed, this connection is ominous of a hidden agenda, an agenda for reconciling Islam and America with an ill conceived and dangerous plan that would become a national catastrophe if put into practice. Am I insinuating that Obama is a secret, practicing Moslem, or a subversive stealth jihadist like Ellison seems to be? That he is wickedly planning to subvert our constitutional Republic and replace it with a Moslem state ruled by Islamic Law? Absolutely not! Obama is not that sinister. He’s a well meaning leftist fool paving the way to national suicide with the best intentions in the world.

What then is Obama up to? What does he have planned? To answer the question we need to recall the morning of June 3rd, the day that Obama flew to Saudi Arabia to consult with King Abdullah on the content of his Cairo Speech. For on that morning at the White House before his trip, as Obama was being interviewed by French TV, he seems to have briefly lost his mind and shocked us with the astonishing words that “the US was one of the largest Moslem nations in the world.”

This was not a mere gaffe like his 57 states mistake, or a statement of fact as America with its 3 or 4 million Moslems ranks 52nd on the population scale. Far from being a gaffe it was a careless slip of Obama’s dissembling tongue; a hidden card that fell from his hand blind and unplanned-like the slip he made with Joe the Plumber on reviving the ruinous welfare state and massively spreading wealth for “everyone‘s good.”

After ten disastrous months of Obama’s bungling presidency many Americans, agreeing with Nicolas Sarkozy, rightly see him as an impractical, unrealistic utopian idealist mentally dwelling in an abstract realm detached from world realities and everyday life-Sarkozy’s “virtual reality.” Indeed, Obama often sees the world as he would like it to be, not as it is, and recklessly acts on his ideals. And on the morning of his trip to Saudi Arabia, when he made that remark to French TV, Obama was having a fit of idealism; he was speaking in terms of “ought” and “should be;” not America as it is but “the more perfect Union” of his badly misguided dreams; a society needing to be radically changed if peace with Islam is to be attained.

Though America is far from being a large Moslem state in Obama’s view this is not how it should be; in his view this is a large measure of the problem dividing America and Islam; in his view America should have tens and millions of Moslems more, not a paltry, insignificant three or four.

For Obama America is way too Western and Christian for its own national good; way too Western and Christian for good relations with Islam; way too Western and Christian for world peace. As reconciliation of America and Islam is the centerpiece of Obama’s foreign policy how then could Islam, with its one billion souls, live in peace with America when too few of its citizens are believers? When our national character is way too Western and Christian? How could there be US-Islamic peace when Islam in America is a small, mostly invisible, insignificant part of our national life? With only 1200 mosques and a few hundred schools and a pathetically low conversion rate-mostly among blacks; when only one member of Congress out of more than 500 is Moslem, how can America and Islam live in peace?

Non-Moslem America by its very exceptional existence as a great world power is an affront and humiliation to Islamic sensibilities and supremacism*; it’s an “aggression**” against the once mighty faith paining by its staggering greatness believing Moslems everywhere. If, believes Obama, the clash of civilizations is to end; if peace is to reign between Islam and the people of this land then our excessively Western character must be tempered and changed: America, in short, must be partially remade in the image of Islam.

*The belief that Islam is God’s ultimate faith and chosen religion for mankind destined to conquer and rule the earth.

**All Militant Moslems believe, and all Moslems are indoctrinated into believing, that non-Moslems are the enemies of God and are at war with Islam whether they violently attack it or not.

With good reason Obama bowed to the Saudi King in London (a country where Moslems are increasing in strength) as they share the same vision for America seeing eye to eye that we must be more Islamized. With good reason Obama appointed Stephen Koh as legal adviser to Hillary Clinton at State. It was Koh who said that establishing Sharia courts in America is acceptable to him and constitutional-as it may also be to Obama who despises constitutional restraints and norms. With good reason Obama criticized the French for banning Moslem girls from covering their heads in public schools. With good reason he favors Moslem immigrants in internal disputes while killing a law suit brought by 9/11 families seeking reparations from the Saudis for funding al-Qaida (see).

As frightening as it is insane Obama’s plans for making peace with Islam is to open the floodgates of Moslem immigration and grow by huge numbers America’s Moslem community. More Moslems at home shrinks the American-Moslem divide worldwide. Unless Moslems have a greater share in American power, wealth and governance peace with Islam will not prevail, and the clash of civilizations will go on.

Obama has studied the history of Islam and keenly feels its pain: its agonizing collapse into powerlessness and squalor after centuries of military and imperial glory; and now he wants to change all that by making Islam powerful again by dramatically multiplying the number of Moslems in American cultural and political life. Keith Ellison is the beginning; he’s the forerunner of a Congress filled with Moslem lawmakers sworn into office on the holy Koran. This is Obama’s vision and plan for America; the America that ought to be; the America of the ideal future. An America where Islam having a high and honored place is at peace with the Moslem world and free from the scourge of Islamic terror.

Obama is not a stealth jihadist in Christian cloths secretly working to make the Koran the constitution of our land. What he is, is a useful liberal idiot and leftist dolt of the Islamic supremicist cause making him as subversively dangerous as the worst of our jihadist foes.

Postscript I

Since I completed this essay it came to my attention that there is now a second Moslem member of Congress, Andre Carson of Indiana. Carson assumed office March 13, 2008. It is unknown if he was sworn in on the Koran.
 
Postscript II: Jeffrey's Comment
 
Jeffrey reminds us of the statement that Obama made in Turkey about America not being a Christian nation. Actually what he said was this:

"One of the great strengths of the United States is.....we have a very large Christian population -- we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values."

Obama is a secular progressive who wants a completely secularized country that is neither Christian, Jewish, Moslem or Hindu; an America where religion is marginalized and plays little or no role in shaping public policy. At the same time, however, he wants the Moslem community of his secularized America to greatly increase in size in order to bridge the great divide between America and Islam. If this seems incoherent to you, it is. That a secularist should want to augment the size and power of any religious group throws logic and consistency to the winds. The president has learned nothing from the example of Western Europe and its Moslem time bomb. Obama, like most everyone on the Left, is an intellectual mess blindly driven by good intentions into socially destructive policies.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CHURCHILL'S BANISHED BUST AND OBAMA'S MOSLEM OUTREACH FIASCO (REVISED)



    The man of blood, sweat, toil and tears.

In February when Barack Obama banished Winston Churchill's priceless bronze bust from the White House-a 9/11 gift on loan from Britain-he was telling the world that his model for diplomacy and foreign policy would be Neville Chamberlain, not Winston Churchill.

Eight months later and Obama hasn't disappointed us as he has given new meaning to the word appeasement and the discredited policies that led humanity into the hell of World War II. Indeed, after 267 days of lurching from one foreign policy blunder to another what rational person would doubt that if Obama had been Britain's Prime Minister in 1938 that he would have suffered Neville Chamberlain's fate at Munich with Hitler turning him into history's biggest and most tragic fool?

The Nobel Committee sees in Obama a huge potential for becoming one of history's great peacemakers; but as Britain's PM in 1938 he would have given us the most horrific war in history all the same. What else can be said of the man who wants to abolish nuclear weapons and return the mankind to the great power wars of the past? The pre-nuclear world that turned the 20th century into a graveyard for millions and gave us the Holocaust? There is no peacemaker in Barack Obama; no man of blood, sweat, toil and tears; only a weak appeasing unfortunate fool who dreams of peace and doesn't know the way.
 


Obama delivering his message to the Moslem world from Cairo University. A man who believes that his words are mighty deeds and all he needs do is speak to move mountains.


The Collapse of Obama's Moslem Outreach Initiative

Obama's biggest foreign policy fiasco to date has been his Moslem Outreach Initiative which he kicked off with his speech in Cairo last June. Obama naively believed that with his Moslem roots, Arabic middle name and (overrated) oratorical gifts-he would mesmerize the Moslem masses into adoring him; and winning over their hearts and minds he'd undo and repair all the damage that was done to US-Moslem relations during the Bush years. For the Islamic world to fall at his feet and sing his praises all that Obama need do was deliver a stirring speech from a Moslem capital flattering Islam and its accomplishments, real or imagined; and show himself an honest broker in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict by condemning Israel's West Bank settlements as illegal and morally wrong.

But that hasn't happened. Predictably Obama's self-serving plan to plant his cult of personality in the Moslem world has miserably backfired and failed. And it's not hard to understand why. Islam is a militant religion based on power and strength, founded by a man of blood and guts who killed and murdered his way to glory and renown; and Moslems see nothing of their founder in Obama-nothing of his forceful, domineering, ruthless personality; nothing worthy of adulation, honor and respect. Unsurprisingly, the Sunni-Arab street is disillusioned with Obama*; disillusioned because he has done nothing to reverse the damage done to Sunniism by Bush's invasion of Iraq** and Israel's humiliating "occupation" of the "Palestinian" West Bank (
see).

*Obama spoke from Cairo a Sunni-Arab capital

**The toppling of Saddam ended 1000 years of Sunni control of Iraq.


Until Iraq is restored to Sunni-Arab rule, and Israel is forced to dismantle its settlements, the Sunni street will continue to see Obama as a weak and impotent leader unworthy to be head of the most powerful nation on earth. Surely the Sunnis at this point have more respect for Obama's hated predecessor as he ordered the destruction of the fearsome Saddam and the murdering, terrorist Taliban and proved himself a valiant warrior like their founder.
 
Postscript
 
When Churchill's bust was being removed from the White House it was seen bursting into tears, weeping for the fate of the world during the Obama years.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FROM NOTHING NOTHING COMES


 
          The wrong stuff for Nobel Prize

Our malignant narcissist in chief sucks up to our enemies and kisses world a$$, showing the nations that he loves them more than America, and the world responds by saying NOBAMA. No to everything from Russia agreeing to tough sanctions on Iran to Europeans sending more troops to Afghanistan; from Israel freezing West Bank settlements to Honduras giving Zalaya back his job. And for his harmlessness and fecklessness, his toothless turning of the cheek, and not being another butt kicking Bush, Obama is awarded a Nobel Prize.

Good work, Mr. President! Never has achieving nothing for this country been so richly rewarded. Never has gutlessness and girlishness won such a prize. With good reason you're the first US President in history whose last name begins with ZERO. As the saying goes from Shakespeare
"From nothing nothing comes."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MEDEVED'S PRAISE OF OBAMA'S NOBEL PRIZE AND ITS MEANING



A cold stiff unfriendly Medeved shaking Obama's hand.

Upon learning of Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize Russian President Dmitry Medvedev had this to say:

"I hope this decision would serve as an additional incentive for our common work to form a new climate in world politics and promote initiatives which are fundamentally important for global security."

What this means is the following:

Now that the Nobel Committee has given its blessing to Obama's doctrine of peace through apology, appeasement and retreat Medeved is hoping that the unearned Nobel Prize will encourage Obama to continue down the path of deconstructing American power so that Russia can replace us on the great world stage.

This is the "zero sum game" that Obama said in his UN speech was obsolete in our day and age. Maybe so for him, maybe for Europe, maybe for the Leftist Nobel Committee; but not for Putin's Russia and our predatory enemies who are eager to see us fall from the pinnicle of world power, and will gladly engage with Obama in castrating us*.
 
*Our enemies see Obama's policy of engagement as cooperating with him in the castration of American power.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE FINAL WORD ON OBAMA'S NOBEL PRIZE (REVISED)


               
                       Alfred Nobel
 
What would have been more shocking than President Obama receiving an undeserved Nobel Peace Prize is what the Nobel Committee would likely have done if John McCain were the 44th President. Indeed, the decision to award Obama the prize was so anti-Bush and nakedly politicized that if he had lost the race in 2008 he would probably have won the prize anyway-as a slap in the face to John McCain and a boost for Obama's 2012 campaign*.

*Beacuse Obama is the politically correct President Norway wants America to have the partisan Nobel Committee would have had his victory in 2012 uppermost in their minds when deciding the winner of the 09 Peace Prize
.
 
Postscipt
 
Senator Obama would have won the prize for his compelling vision of engagement, diplomacy, multilateralism and the use of soft power for resolving international conflicts; and, of course, for his dream of an egalitarian world order free of nuclear weapons living in brotherhood, peace and shared prosperity. Obama's efforts to end the threatening menace of global warming would also have been cited as a reason for giving him the prize.
 
In their statement awarding Obama the prize the Nobel Committee would have done its best to shame and humiliate the American people for having missed their chance for national redemption and global transformation when McCain won the race on Election Day-giving the world four more years of Bush's unilateralism, bellicosity and swaggering warmongering cowboy foreign policy.



 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive